Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D83200B5C for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 18:28:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 35848160A93; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 827B1160A90 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 18:28:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 72385 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2016 16:28:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hawq.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 72370 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2016 16:28:09 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:28:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 0ECC9189C8D for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:28:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.28 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.28 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pivotal-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx2-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z5kJ3THCfdbp for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com (mail-oi0-f41.google.com [209.85.218.41]) by mx2-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 02DA65F255 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f41.google.com with SMTP id l203so1027285oib.1 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:28:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pivotal-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=M1G08Qhn7fMMY4KPgIfatjFzOHsbV4YBMhw8PsilaHA=; b=QAVvhPaEmfUG9nbL67ovdKjT/bDFF62jV+P61t0FWzYo/YMseUpCgjdG6hYEakRuOz CB2ivzVbeywrgQFLqSvUJyj3pHCK1UVwQIxiHp/HHz9gOjz1rEQh/lrtCxhNokIOl6/i lyRLzZaJIRT96aXktBoWDKYELOfk7Wul40kjHe89UWUkGqz9181F2iXw7tuNZxATod+H rd8UWffSp6cDxQmi1ej7rERzCsuJbaWVpW5dyXzElQWye2OGj9/gaA5wkIZ1rtT/fzoB 6Dt7yUjV5yLb1EAmTr18n7Oqcnkl+Xq4bz1QynnRovxvsOqhoESr1y7aHLoEiwTwxI7W cyww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=M1G08Qhn7fMMY4KPgIfatjFzOHsbV4YBMhw8PsilaHA=; b=bldTEbRb+euHzJufliuQMxmyF+o/EKHZf6Im1iGj7WyHLLCkbdEjGHfw0Am7+ehB1j k/sNj5gQP4MoxdV2dbmeSg0RI8/SxmIhYnWYWhtoZ8AdXI0kQyNF7/Q55gy7CGEuIZJr LdBK0v97Q3a72rCjqVKtVoBFgSQLkVDo7aIYPUW8SwckjRaEyfZWwJ3GVOFd1CI49f+x wPWTXTrAV/TFCcCw3qI5AMUBRMC2QWbSdEB+Xlr6ogeIJ1ud0Ifh3eTlLbxUxFD1BRbX /UsbDKc7S+lBy/Bs7iBC3JC6LuWoIV4Ik30j6uVUdhm3Haz4fG7m5TOJzeqRLI8UtfmV 3TvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuCyQra/XVa/QBOQerrwTfeApDE+34y2TRl4N8ij9Jr47ujzhgY1Sp2gR7Cxa1UT0e+6QH478NsTZX71z6Y X-Received: by 10.157.17.54 with SMTP id g51mr2476343ote.101.1470932885687; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:28:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.59.215 with HTTP; Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:28:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jane Beckman Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 09:28:05 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (HAWQ-999) Treat hash table as random when file count is not in proportion to bucket number of table. To: dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org Cc: issues@hawq.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11414bf423e4b40539ce4027 archived-at: Thu, 11 Aug 2016 16:28:11 -0000 --001a11414bf423e4b40539ce4027 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sounds like this should be noted in the documentation? On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 6:49 AM, Lirong Jian (JIRA) wrote: > > [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-999?page=com. > atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment- > tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15417271#comment-15417271 ] > > Lirong Jian commented on HAWQ-999: > ---------------------------------- > > Would you please explain a little bit under what kind of circumstance this > mismatch would occur? > > Lirong > > > Treat hash table as random when file count is not in proportion to > bucket number of table. > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------ > > > > Key: HAWQ-999 > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-999 > > Project: Apache HAWQ > > Issue Type: Improvement > > Components: Core > > Reporter: Hubert Zhang > > Assignee: Hubert Zhang > > > > By definition, file count of a hash table should be equal to or a > multiple of the bucket number of the table. So if mismatch happens, we > should not treat it as hash table in data locality algorithm. > > > > -- > This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA > (v6.3.4#6332) > --001a11414bf423e4b40539ce4027--