hawq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ting(Goden) Yao" <t...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: Rename "greenplum" to "hawq"
Date Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:41:26 GMT
Thanks, I've update the JIRA with more info and corrected versions. I think
we have the consensus that this needs to be done.
Please add more details in the JIRA or add tasks as appropriate.

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:33 AM Lisa Owen <lowen@pivotal.io> wrote:

> there is an existing JIRA related to renaming greenplum references:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-902
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Ting(Goden) Yao <tyao@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > can anyone who knows details start filing jira and mark the version to
> > "2.0.1.0-incubating" or backlog?
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:56 PM Hubert Zhang <hzhang@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 This is a legacy problem. Clear GUCs including "GP" may be the first
> > > step.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Wen Lin <wlin@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > > It's definitely a good thing, but needs very careful thought on
> effects
> > > to
> > > > customers.
> > > > We can try to list these effects as much as possile.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Yi Jin <yjin@pivotal.io> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I think it is a must-do, but some concerns of customer using
> > convention
> > > > and
> > > > > legacy applications, scripts etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:44 PM, 陶征霖 <ztao1987@apache.org>
wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Good idea, but need quite a lot of effort and may also affect
> > > custormer
> > > > > > behavior. Should handle it carefully.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2016-07-13 9:54 GMT+08:00 Ivan Weng <iweng@pivotal.io>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Agree with this good idea. But as Paul said, there are
maybe
> > > already
> > > > > many
> > > > > > > users use greeenplum_path.sh or something else in their
> > > environment.
> > > > So
> > > > > > we
> > > > > > > need to think about it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Ivan
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Paul Guo <paulguo@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I've asked this before. Seems that affects some old
users.
> I'm
> > > not
> > > > > sure
> > > > > > > > about the details.
> > > > > > > > I agree that we should change it to a better name
in a
> release.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 2016-07-13 9:25 GMT+08:00 Roman Shaposhnik <
> > roman@shaposhnik.org
> > > >:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Xiang Sheng
<
> > > xsheng@pivotal.io>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Agree . @xunzhang.
> > > > > > > > > > However , some greenplum strings can be
easily replaced ,
> > but
> > > > > there
> > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > too
> > > > > > > > > > many in the code or comments.  Changing
all of them costs
> > too
> > > > > much
> > > > > > > > > efforts.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > So changing the strings that users can see
is enough.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Huge +1 to this! Btw, is this something we may
be able to
> > > tackle
> > > > in
> > > > > > our
> > > > > > > > > next Apache release?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Roman.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Zhenglin
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Hubert Zhang
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message