hawq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Ting(Goden) Yao" <t...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: Rename "greenplum" to "hawq"
Date Wed, 13 Jul 2016 17:20:30 GMT
can anyone who knows details start filing jira and mark the version to
"2.0.1.0-incubating" or backlog?

On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 11:56 PM Hubert Zhang <hzhang@pivotal.io> wrote:

> +1 This is a legacy problem. Clear GUCs including "GP" may be the first
> step.
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Wen Lin <wlin@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > It's definitely a good thing, but needs very careful thought on effects
> to
> > customers.
> > We can try to list these effects as much as possile.
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Yi Jin <yjin@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> > > I think it is a must-do, but some concerns of customer using convention
> > and
> > > legacy applications, scripts etc.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:44 PM, 陶征霖 <ztao1987@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Good idea, but need quite a lot of effort and may also affect
> custormer
> > > > behavior. Should handle it carefully.
> > > >
> > > > 2016-07-13 9:54 GMT+08:00 Ivan Weng <iweng@pivotal.io>:
> > > >
> > > > > Agree with this good idea. But as Paul said, there are maybe
> already
> > > many
> > > > > users use greeenplum_path.sh or something else in their
> environment.
> > So
> > > > we
> > > > > need to think about it.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Ivan
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Paul Guo <paulguo@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I've asked this before. Seems that affects some old users. I'm
> not
> > > sure
> > > > > > about the details.
> > > > > > I agree that we should change it to a better name in a release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2016-07-13 9:25 GMT+08:00 Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org
> >:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Xiang Sheng <
> xsheng@pivotal.io>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Agree . @xunzhang.
> > > > > > > > However , some greenplum strings can be easily replaced
, but
> > > there
> > > > > are
> > > > > > > too
> > > > > > > > many in the code or comments.  Changing all of them
costs too
> > > much
> > > > > > > efforts.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > So changing the strings that users can see is enough.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Huge +1 to this! Btw, is this something we may be able
to
> tackle
> > in
> > > > our
> > > > > > > next Apache release?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Roman.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Zhenglin
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
>
> Hubert Zhang
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message