hawq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jiali Yao <j...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: Rename "greenplum" to "hawq"
Date Wed, 13 Jul 2016 06:06:53 GMT
I think it would be more confusing since there are two files and
environment variables have same purpose.
I think it is worth to investigate the impact from code and user and to
replace greenplum.

Jiali


On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Lili Ma <lilima@apache.org> wrote:

> For the command line tools name, what about we keep greenplum_path.sh and
> add a hawq_env.sh and inside hawq_env.sh, we call greenplum_path.sh. So the
> already user won't need to change their behavior, and new user can directly
> use the new hawq named script?
>
> For the environment variable, for example GPHOME,can we create a new
> variable HAWQHOME, and set it the same value as GPHOME?
>
>
> Thanks
> Lili
>
> 2016-07-13 13:55 GMT+08:00 Yi Jin <yjin@pivotal.io>:
>
> > I think it is a must-do, but some concerns of customer using convention
> and
> > legacy applications, scripts etc.
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:44 PM, 陶征霖 <ztao1987@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Good idea, but need quite a lot of effort and may also affect custormer
> > > behavior. Should handle it carefully.
> > >
> > > 2016-07-13 9:54 GMT+08:00 Ivan Weng <iweng@pivotal.io>:
> > >
> > > > Agree with this good idea. But as Paul said, there are maybe already
> > many
> > > > users use greeenplum_path.sh or something else in their environment.
> So
> > > we
> > > > need to think about it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Ivan
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Paul Guo <paulguo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I've asked this before. Seems that affects some old users. I'm not
> > sure
> > > > > about the details.
> > > > > I agree that we should change it to a better name in a release.
> > > > >
> > > > > 2016-07-13 9:25 GMT+08:00 Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Xiang Sheng <xsheng@pivotal.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > Agree . @xunzhang.
> > > > > > > However , some greenplum strings can be easily replaced
, but
> > there
> > > > are
> > > > > > too
> > > > > > > many in the code or comments.  Changing all of them costs
too
> > much
> > > > > > efforts.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > So changing the strings that users can see is enough.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Huge +1 to this! Btw, is this something we may be able to tackle
> in
> > > our
> > > > > > next Apache release?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Roman.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks,
> > > Zhenglin
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message