Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1FA200B38 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 07:31:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 7DAF5160A68; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id CAB8E160A59 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 07:31:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 89211 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2016 05:31:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hawq.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89199 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2016 05:31:23 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:31:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 5C40FC8665 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:31:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.299 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.299 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pivotal-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yToqjnUVcv37 for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f174.google.com (mail-io0-f174.google.com [209.85.223.174]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id AFA485F3FF for ; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f174.google.com with SMTP id f30so90986678ioj.2 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 22:31:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pivotal-io.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=CfFAcpqX/oRo4lkw5iAmwHJ3TcJ3o0SfsNcwVn9S3VY=; b=n0eeyO34Jhbb/JqUYWPkoCuA5ntfIS+ixTLDu0Ae4k8fml5WG4YEn+A5VZVaJ2pJwX ywJq7g5YQ7RYY/i0f/NHUcPtidHpKcQjgE+ySX5up34+U/xmmfbyO1nrS5b2CyBf4yNd B5JiLALy3Haya92k/8P6auv6CJSjxSHzGec5Jnb5iBUxr3THBEv3sRp2Nhzr4Bh3aeJz uxxXmVp6IpVuZhiXoUpCI12MrF03S/7P+n80m/vAfb9RGeXTpasBdbyEJl7PPwgR/s4X nPXKCdQVtA7EGDsGv7mtpGIrkfi0U2UgXIF3+kKjHv+5AYmK8lLu0DusTxLVze+5n6RK JbSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=CfFAcpqX/oRo4lkw5iAmwHJ3TcJ3o0SfsNcwVn9S3VY=; b=EQ4X3ML0TS9t5UUAa6XzNGnM+rDct0EhUxf3ekuHm8UURIxaOw4tSJgIJwZ/VEeBjR yuDzsGaGDxakzGo7SsaxtvZkx9I3g6bIwY4AWCdJV/YlFEGi7R+uEeDPlIr8jmgCrsta JqBF22sxCT+rvkfs8/rbc7qcKgK+aS9pITgcQSZ9SH4Rkx4YN6CGOsHg6chfxtX0JfGm 0nlGooyHgcodi21XTUp8E788S9cbqmCPP5XTRzCj7TiP7wkcPm3HXqom7qU03lQMI5gs KPCWrUR/LCNdZwuAYo7fVfaOYSAKcMj0mhv41rnrg81klogFlhIIVB8tfapijoHPYIeH nHEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJU18a1n4O4+cXiQUUDR2rBbLe/lgA2x5TZuB47IRZqpZ8YX51r1NLrJM0CEG81tj8DmZf2Xv5t5c84uslc X-Received: by 10.107.174.198 with SMTP id n67mr4252932ioo.96.1466746272909; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 22:31:12 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.142.150 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 22:31:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jiali Yao Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 13:31:12 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Integrate ICG to GTest To: dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1144736e92e2e20535ff7a0b archived-at: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 05:31:25 -0000 --001a1144736e92e2e20535ff7a0b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1 for the doc https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md For test we suggest that all new tests should use google test. Existing install check good tests should be moved to google test. What is your thoughts? Thanks Jiali On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Shivram Mani wrote: > Thumbs up on transitioning to Google test framework. This is a doc that has > detailed benefits of Googletest framework > https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/Primer.md > . > How do we plan to transition test to the GTest framework. Are we only going > to target adding new tests in the framework or do we plan to do a bulk > transfer of existing test ? > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Jiali Yao wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > In HAWQ test, google test is used for libyarn and libhdfs test. Install > > check test framework is used for smoke test and has a lot of limitations. > > To make it easy to learn and consolidate test, we want to unify the two > > frameworks. Considering below factors, we want to use google test: > > > > - It supports more functions and then a developer can write more > complex > > tests which are not only limited to SQL test. > > - Google test support run test parallelly. > > - Google mock is an extension for google test, it can also be used for > > unit test. > > > > For detail information please refer to > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-832 > > > > Looking forward to your comments. > > > > Thanks > > > > Jiali > > > > > > -- > shivram mani > --001a1144736e92e2e20535ff7a0b--