hawq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Radar Da lei <r...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: First HAWQ release
Date Wed, 22 Jun 2016 00:48:35 GMT
Hi Goden,

I used branch name as '2.0.0-incubating'.

BTW, this branch is at Apache side, does this need to be sync to GITHUB?

Thanks.

Regards,
Radar

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 8:40 AM, Ting(Goden) Yao <tyao@pivotal.io> wrote:

> I don't see a branch named "hawq 2.0.0-incubating" , which name did you use
> for the branch?
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 10:21 PM Radar Da lei <rlei@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > Hi Vineet,
> >
> > Quicklz already been removed. I will cut a branch now.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Radar
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Vineet Goel <vvineet@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 to the proposed release name and cutting a release branch asap.
> > > Sounds like we need to find a good commit point right after the Apache
> > > release requirements were met (quicklz removal etc).
> > >
> > > -Vineet
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Ting(Goden) Yao <tyao@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I can start the voting process - Also I'd like to change the release
> > name
> > > > to "2.0.0-incubating" , removing the beta tag given we've passed that
> > > point
> > > > in the timeline.
> > > > I also need help to cut a clean release branch as there's been so
> many
> > > > commits coming in which is not in the original scope - can anyone who
> > > made
> > > > the commits help me on that?
> > > >
> > > > -Goden
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 9:37 PM Lei Chang <lei_chang@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > A summary on the JIRAs left:
> > > > >
> > > > > HAWQ-783: it needs catalog changes, so I think it is better to put
> it
> > > > into
> > > > > following release and the impact is small.
> > > > > HAWQ-460: resolved since thrift library is in.
> > > > >
> > > > > Looks we are ready to go for voting if no other issues left or
> > > concerns!
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers
> > > > > Lei
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Ting(Goden) Yao <tyao@pivotal.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I still have concerns that left out HAWQ-783 is not a clean
cut
> for
> > > > this
> > > > > > release.
> > > > > > Guo - can you shed some light on what's the impact of leaving
> this
> > to
> > > > the
> > > > > > future?
> > > > > > I may also go through the previous commits and understand the
> > > changes.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 4:26 PM Roman Shaposhnik <
> > > roman@shaposhnik.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Guo Gang <paulguo@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > HAWQ-783 (Remove quickly in metadata) is a JIRA for
future
> > work.
> > > > This
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > for the shortcoming next release. Please remove the
jira from
> > the
> > > > > > > blocking
> > > > > > > > lists.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ok, if we're down to HAWQ-460 as the only release blocker,
can
> > > > somebody
> > > > > > > please
> > > > > > > provide an update? The last comment on the JIRA was more
than a
> > > month
> > > > > > ago.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Roman.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message