Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hawq.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: 
 <CA+ULb+sf+DTGfbZHKQgYLN2KWqD+66j9iq8oB87sFfrAJjS6aQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE44UQdM0asHYZQufcw7D6zzKGWf_4k240aPOMEF5JcBN6jRaw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+ULb+vkDWbP+NO7FQX71FZCMrfprmemYT3QvjAsfTGeL9ptQw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOjayEd_6vvHA7ktXKamNeNHWp2LAqdzA7S-gm=LmK2NF2+_NA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOjayEd_6vvHA7ktXKamNeNHWp2LAqdzA7S-gm=LmK2NF2+_NA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ting(Goden) Yao" <tyao@pivotal.io>
Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2016 22:04:02 +0000
Message-ID: 
 <CAPgpW0b18reHC_4GESOr-3YuGbj1vhrAXyGnHxa_POBiq8WMVg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Clover license file
To: dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ecda09d2fcc0528c5a681

--001a113ecda09d2fcc0528c5a681
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Filed a JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-327
As code coverage is a little bit beyond Roman's original plan to just
remove garbage file, I'm assigning this to Jiali to take a look first.


On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 12:16 PM Caleb Welton <cwelton@pivotal.io> wrote:

> This looks like it is the code coverage tool that was used for the
> hawq-hadoop contrib module, the license file is referenced by all the pom
> files under contrib/hawq-hadoop and I expect it would break at least the
> code coverage tests if it was removed.
>
> ./hawq-mapreduce-ao/pom.xml:
>  <licenseLocation>../lib/clover.license</licenseLocation>
> ./hawq-mapreduce-common/pom.xml:
>  <licenseLocation>../lib/clover.license</licenseLocation>
> ./hawq-mapreduce-parquet/pom.xml:
>  <licenseLocation>../lib/clover.license</licenseLocation>
> ./hawq-mapreduce-tool/pom.xml:
>  <licenseLocation>../lib/clover.license</licenseLocation>
> ./pom.xml: <licenseLocation>lib/clover.license</licenseLocation>
>
> That said... I strongly doubt that it is kosher to place a license file
> that almost certainly was not a worldwide license into the OSS. This should
> be removed and Pivotal should contact Atlassian about the unintentional
> license leak.
>
> For reference this[1] looks like the correct identity resolution for this
> particular 'clover'.
>
> [1] https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/CLOVER/About+Clover
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Lei Chang <chang.lei.cn@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > This looks a garbage file.
> >
> > Shall I go ahead an remove it? (I promise to file a JIRA this time around
> > ;-))
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
> >
>

--001a113ecda09d2fcc0528c5a681--