hawq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ruilong Huo <r...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4
Date Tue, 26 Jan 2016 05:14:55 GMT
Downloaded, deployed, tested and reviewed it. +1

Best regards,
Ruilong Huo

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:41 PM, Lei Chang <lei_chang@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Cheers
> Lei
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Lei, can you please explicitly cast +1/-1 vote?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Lei Chang <lei_chang@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Look good!
> > >
> > > Run mvn verify, get:
> > >
> > > *****************************************************
> > >
> > > Summary
> > >
> > > -------
> > >
> > > Generated at: 2016-01-24T19:50:43-08:00
> > >
> > > Notes: 5
> > >
> > > Binaries: 0
> > >
> > > Archives: 0
> > >
> > > Standards: 2627
> > >
> > > Apache Licensed: 1796
> > >
> > > Generated Documents: 0
> > >
> > > JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional
> > >
> > > Generated files do not required license headers
> > >
> > > 0 Unknown Licenses
> > >
> > > *******************************
> > >
> > > Unapproved licenses:
> > >
> > > *******************************
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > > Lei Chang
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <
> roman@shaposhnik.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Caleb Welton <cwelton@pivotal.io>
> > wrote:
> > >> > First question for me is:
> > >> > - We have a couple existing jiras on IP clearance, including
> > >> >       - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-184
> > >> >       - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-207
> > >> >
> > >> > In particular if HAWQ-184 has *not* been resolved then how are we
> > clear
> > >> of
> > >> > our IP issues?  I see that there was a commit associated with the
> > issue,
> > >> so
> > >> > perhaps this is just a lack of jira hygiene?
> > >>
> > >> I wasn't too eager to resolve 184 until the vote passes,
> > >> as for 207 -- that ended up being fixed in a different way
> > >> and I resolve it as not applicable anymore.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Roman.
> > >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message