hawq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] HAWQ 2.0.0-beta-incubating RC4
Date Mon, 25 Jan 2016 22:33:35 GMT
Lei, can you please explicitly cast +1/-1 vote?

Thanks,
Roman.

On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Lei Chang <lei_chang@apache.org> wrote:
> Look good!
>
> Run mvn verify, get:
>
> *****************************************************
>
> Summary
>
> -------
>
> Generated at: 2016-01-24T19:50:43-08:00
>
> Notes: 5
>
> Binaries: 0
>
> Archives: 0
>
> Standards: 2627
>
> Apache Licensed: 1796
>
> Generated Documents: 0
>
> JavaDocs are generated and so license header is optional
>
> Generated files do not required license headers
>
> 0 Unknown Licenses
>
> *******************************
>
> Unapproved licenses:
>
> *******************************
>
> Cheers
>
> Lei Chang
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Caleb Welton <cwelton@pivotal.io> wrote:
>> > First question for me is:
>> > - We have a couple existing jiras on IP clearance, including
>> >       - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-184
>> >       - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-207
>> >
>> > In particular if HAWQ-184 has *not* been resolved then how are we clear
>> of
>> > our IP issues?  I see that there was a commit associated with the issue,
>> so
>> > perhaps this is just a lack of jira hygiene?
>>
>> I wasn't too eager to resolve 184 until the vote passes,
>> as for 207 -- that ended up being fixed in a different way
>> and I resolve it as not applicable anymore.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>>

Mime
View raw message