Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hawq.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOeZVier8uOZaFCsO9D=Xq+jWLgYPuEeNOkytEx7=1A-p-HRYQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAOeZVier8uOZaFCsO9D=Xq+jWLgYPuEeNOkytEx7=1A-p-HRYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Shivram Mani <shivram.mani@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 07:00:14 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CALpJHBC6ex3g2h-2+sdV=DPahu4utP7vuKwc4qVc7H=CDQRaGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CTR vs RTC
To: dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b4179b1953e180524451667

--047d7b4179b1953e180524451667
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Atri, there was a discussion on RTC vs CTR in this forum with the subject
"Staying with RTC (review-then-commit) rule".
You can refer to the current commit/review process here
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HAWQ/Contributing+to+HAWQ


On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:41 AM, Atri Sharma <atri@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Team,
>
> Apologies if this is repost or have been already discussed.
>
> I feel we should outline the commit policy at this point and it will ease
> out further processes for us.
>
> Commit to review -- committers commit and commit mails are watches by other
> community members. Anybody can raise concerns if seen.
>
> Review to commit -- review signoffs are needed before committer can commit
> patch.
>
> Thoughts please?
>
> Regards,
>
> Atri
>


-- 
shivram mani

--047d7b4179b1953e180524451667--