Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-hawq-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-hawq-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E5851792E for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33915 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2015 12:11:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-hawq-dev-archive@hawq.apache.org Received: (qmail 33868 invoked by uid 500); 28 Sep 2015 12:11:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@hawq.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 33856 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2015 12:11:18 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:11:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id D21D9C6990 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:11:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.665 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.665 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.037, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jIapKuOxFiPY for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com (mail-io0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id EF15920595 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ioiz6 with SMTP id z6so171724945ioi.2 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 05:11:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=axjQtuTp0mH3i48tdjRM7qDwHAV7f9uNtdmVLEK0/aY=; b=Jd/d5LM6BFN+A2nVh5arahanLFiDlKXrQmaSCPe2FOIfGB4ruu/vcD8wgq5j9vjeHk vtUibt/N7QtEest3k4yLtEhAotAM/pdemqKvr2G2eZbXCDqI1a8eu7FS/TsLdJsdWgTW aX27VLw95db9IxgEz7+Audv3vwtpFVl9DccFa56RFS5Dr3ovLJISd9aWdyWSFpVS1A6w l1hZIgTDjzIt+quvE9Cxn+0+fwYra/IeHcmQDZtWravtcVOzp4YtUFe++BekwPtWdhJD OTW7m3sSFgiH3CEpKtQc7iTtR9IbCDqJGYeXCTd+86a5nbeoiJNhF7qUxHw0UbtDhcgE in8A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.136.203 with SMTP id s72mr18329388ioi.197.1443442276362; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 05:11:16 -0700 (PDT) Sender: shaposhnik@gmail.com Received: by 10.50.79.165 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 05:11:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 15:11:16 +0300 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3czG_OQ5ZDqlqK3BogpMcC0I9v8 Message-ID: Subject: Staying with RTC (review-then-commit) rule From: Roman Shaposhnik To: dev@hawq.incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi! just wanted to say what I said on HAWQ-7, but since not all of us are watching that JIRA, I think it would be useful to repeat it here. While there's nothing wrong with lazy consensus, but initially I'd suggest staying with RTC model. Thus +1 from somebody else should be explicitly required. I don't think there's any disagreement, but I just wanted to have it explicitly mentioned. Thanks, Roman.