hawq-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Caleb Welton <cwel...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: Staying with RTC (review-then-commit) rule
Date Mon, 28 Sep 2015 12:45:30 GMT
Konstantin, I don't think all the developers are aware of the differences
between CTR and RTC.  Would you care to elaborate on the contribution
protocols?

Thanks!


On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org> wrote:

> I am the big advocate of CTR model and has been pushing it in a number of
> the
> projects before. However, for the very early ones like Hawq right now, RTC
> might make more sense: it takes time to learn how to add new trusty people
> to
> the community; also for new committers it helps to learn the code faster by
> doing the mandatory reviews. But before you know it, I will be doing rounds
> here pushing for CTR ;)
>
> Cos
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 03:11PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > just wanted to say what I said on HAWQ-7, but
> > since not all of us are watching that JIRA, I think
> > it would be useful to repeat it here.
> >
> > While there's nothing wrong with lazy consensus,
> > but initially I'd suggest staying with RTC model.
> > Thus +1 from somebody else should be explicitly
> > required.
> >
> > I don't think there's any disagreement, but I just
> > wanted to have it explicitly mentioned.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Roman.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message