harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From enh <...@google.com>
Subject Re: FYI: I'm dividing up some test cases
Date Fri, 07 Jan 2011 16:17:42 GMT
i think i've seen some tests that were written in this style in the
first place, using suffixes like ...ExceptionPriority and
...SecurityManager.

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 02:40, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/Jan/2011 06:30, Jimmy,Jing Lv wrote:
>> Hi Jesse,
>>
>>        Yes in early Harmony development, we have an agreement that we will
>> follow RI's behavior to make Harmony compatible to serve more application as
>> possible - which includes exceptions etc (unless RI does break spec or is
>> not logical). So I believe there are many testcases checking such
>> exceptions.
>>        Jesse, I am not against this proposal, but I wonder if it will be a
>> large mount of work to split them all (unless we found an automatic
>> solution, e.g, searching the test source for try-catch).
>
> Same here, no objections and good luck finding them all ;-)
>
> Do you (Jesse) have a naming scheme/whatever in mind for the separation
> so that you can easily avoid them?  (cue perennial debate about testing
> structure/package names/test names/annotations/...)
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>



-- 
Elliott Hughes - http://who/enh - http://jessies.org/~enh/

Mime
View raw message