| Klaus Reimer |
Freeze on JFrame pack |
Wed, 01 Dec, 08:33 |
| Dima Kalinin |
dev@harmony.apache.org |
Fri, 03 Dec, 09:23 |
| Dima Kalinin |
Re: dev@harmony.apache.org |
Fri, 03 Dec, 10:47 |
| Tim Ellison |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Mon, 06 Dec, 10:22 |
| Ray Chen |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Mon, 06 Dec, 15:31 |
| Tim Ellison |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Tue, 07 Dec, 10:48 |
| Joe Droider |
Looking for help to port Harmony JVM to an embedded target |
Tue, 07 Dec, 14:54 |
| Ray Chen |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Wed, 08 Dec, 01:55 |
| Ray Chen |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Wed, 08 Dec, 09:21 |
| Ray Chen |
Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: Harmony-1.5-head-linux-x86_64 #1012 |
Wed, 08 Dec, 12:11 |
| Tim Ellison |
Re: Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: Harmony-1.5-head-linux-x86_64 #1012 |
Wed, 08 Dec, 12:50 |
| Tim Ellison |
Re: Looking for help to port Harmony JVM to an embedded target |
Wed, 08 Dec, 12:54 |
| Ray Chen |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Wed, 08 Dec, 13:05 |
| Tim Ellison |
Re: Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: Harmony-1.5-head-linux-x86_64 #1012 |
Wed, 08 Dec, 22:24 |
| Tim Ellison |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Thu, 09 Dec, 10:10 |
| Mark Hindess |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Thu, 09 Dec, 10:11 |
| Tim Ellison |
[general] Board report due |
Fri, 10 Dec, 12:37 |
| Ray Chen |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Mon, 13 Dec, 08:23 |
| Tim Ellison |
Re: Fwd: Build failed in Hudson: Harmony-1.5-head-linux-x86_64 #1012 |
Mon, 13 Dec, 11:32 |
| Tim Ellison |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Mon, 13 Dec, 11:37 |
| Tim Ellison |
[build] Minor help text change |
Mon, 13 Dec, 14:00 |
| Mark Hindess |
Re: [build] Minor help text change |
Mon, 13 Dec, 14:36 |
| Ray Chen |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Mon, 13 Dec, 15:40 |
| Tim Ellison |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Mon, 13 Dec, 15:45 |
| Ray Chen |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Mon, 13 Dec, 15:49 |
| Tim Ellison |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Mon, 13 Dec, 16:18 |
| Ray Chen |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Tue, 14 Dec, 01:55 |
| Tim Ellison |
[testing] Test results for 5.0 branch |
Wed, 15 Dec, 14:25 |
| Sian January |
[build] Failure in org.apache.harmony.pack200.tests.PackingOptionsTest.testModificationTime - commit fix or not? |
Wed, 15 Dec, 14:33 |
| Tim Ellison |
Re: [build] Failure in org.apache.harmony.pack200.tests.PackingOptionsTest.testModificationTime - commit fix or not? |
Wed, 15 Dec, 14:41 |
| Alex Blewitt |
Re: [build] Failure in org.apache.harmony.pack200.tests.PackingOptionsTest.testModificationTime - commit fix or not? |
Wed, 15 Dec, 15:11 |
| Sian January |
Re: [build] Failure in org.apache.harmony.pack200.tests.PackingOptionsTest.testModificationTime - commit fix or not? |
Wed, 15 Dec, 15:12 |
| Sian January |
Re: [build] Failure in org.apache.harmony.pack200.tests.PackingOptionsTest.testModificationTime - commit fix or not? |
Wed, 15 Dec, 16:17 |
| Mark Hindess |
Re: [build] Minor help text change |
Thu, 16 Dec, 12:26 |
| Tim Ellison |
Re: [build] Minor help text change |
Thu, 16 Dec, 14:08 |
| Sam Ruby |
re : Board report October - December 2010 |
Thu, 16 Dec, 16:39 |
| Paul Anderson |
Harmony could be a world beater with the right strategy, not rot in the attic! |
Thu, 16 Dec, 18:02 |
| Volker Berlin |
AW: Harmony could be a world beater with the right strategy, not rot in the attic! |
Thu, 16 Dec, 19:05 |
| Paul Anderson |
Re: AW: Harmony could be a world beater with the right strategy, not rot in the attic! |
Thu, 16 Dec, 20:08 |
| chris.g...@k-embedded-java.com |
Re: AW: Harmony could be a world beater with the right strategy, not rot in the attic! |
Thu, 16 Dec, 22:37 |
| Alexei Fedotov |
Re: re : Board report October - December 2010 |
Thu, 16 Dec, 22:57 |
| Paul Anderson |
Re: AW: Harmony could be a world beater with the right strategy, not rot in the attic! |
Thu, 16 Dec, 23:30 |
| Ray Chen |
Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4 |
Fri, 17 Dec, 16:58 |
| Jimmy,Jing Lv |
Re: re : Board report October - December 2010 |
Sat, 18 Dec, 15:22 |
| johann Sorel |
roadmap suggestion |
Sun, 19 Dec, 00:11 |
| Jimmy,Jing Lv |
Re: roadmap suggestion |
Wed, 22 Dec, 05:44 |
| Paul Anderson |
Re: roadmap suggestion |
Wed, 22 Dec, 14:45 |
| chris.g...@k-embedded-java.com |
Re: roadmap suggestion |
Wed, 22 Dec, 22:43 |
| Paul Anderson |
Re: roadmap suggestion |
Thu, 23 Dec, 03:14 |
| hari ks |
strong type cast needed in java. (overriding enhancement.) |
Thu, 23 Dec, 06:35 |
| Alex Blewitt |
Re: strong type cast needed in java. (overriding enhancement.) |
Thu, 23 Dec, 09:30 |
| Volker Berlin |
RE: roadmap suggestion |
Thu, 23 Dec, 10:02 |
| Jimmy,Jing Lv |
Re: strong type cast needed in java. (overriding enhancement.) |
Thu, 23 Dec, 10:04 |
| hari ks |
Re: strong type cast needed in java. (overriding enhancement.) |
Thu, 23 Dec, 12:36 |
| hari ks |
Re: strong type cast needed in java. (overriding enhancement.) |
Thu, 23 Dec, 14:06 |
| Jimmy,Jing Lv |
Re: strong type cast needed in java. (overriding enhancement.) |
Thu, 23 Dec, 16:13 |
| hari ks |
Re: strong type cast needed in java. (overriding enhancement.) |
Fri, 24 Dec, 02:36 |
| Xiao-Feng Li |
Re: roadmap suggestion |
Sun, 26 Dec, 08:15 |
| Prashanth K S |
Re: strong type cast needed in java. (overriding enhancement.) |
Mon, 27 Dec, 04:54 |
| chris.g...@k-embedded-java.com |
Re: strong type cast needed in java. (overriding enhancement.) |
Wed, 29 Dec, 15:15 |