harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ray Chen <clrayc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Next milestones: 5.0M16 and 6.0M4
Date Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:49:42 GMT
Hmmm... OK, let's deferring that to the next milestone.

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 13/Dec/2010 15:40, Ray Chen wrote:
> > FYI.
> > This defect should be fixed in this milestone, see
> > http://s.apache.org/harmony/roadmap mentioned by Mark
>
> I see it is targeted to this milestone, I'm questioning whether that is
> correct.
>
> Why do you think it needs to be fixed now rather than deferring to the
> next milestone?
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>
> > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> On 13/Dec/2010 08:23, Ray Chen wrote:
> >>> Hi Comitters,
> >>> I have reviewed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6656,
> >> seems
> >>> look good.
> >>> I remember that there should be at least two committers to agree to
> apply
> >> a
> >>> patch during code freeze time, right?
> >>>
> >>> Does anyone else can help to review this patch?
> >>
> >> During freeze time we only apply patches that are resolving blocking
> >> issues for the release to ensure we retain stability.
> >>
> >> Is this a regression from behavior that worked in the 5.0M15 milestone?
> >> (I don't think so) or is it a major failure that means we should restart
> >> testing?
> >>
> >> I suggest this may be a candidate for defering until the next milestone.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Tim
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>



-- 
Regards,

Ray Chen

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message