From dev-return-39926-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Mon Oct 04 23:10:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72553 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2010 23:10:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2010 23:10:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 21627 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 23:10:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 21513 invoked by uid 500); 4 Oct 2010 23:10:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 21504 invoked by uid 99); 4 Oct 2010 23:10:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:10:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jessewilson@google.com designates 216.239.44.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.239.44.51] (HELO smtp-out.google.com) (216.239.44.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 23:10:26 +0000 Received: from wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com (wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com [172.24.198.93]) by smtp-out.google.com with ESMTP id o94NA4KU026857 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:10:05 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; t=1286233805; bh=HCdTQOK/IQ6EbqovrXM8HrXgX9A=; h=MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Content-Type; b=Ldph9kKgKMqViTadcsL2m7DZUXEIcXtBYKlzf4FvOHRgOeIMlNUdtitJeMYyPxRh5 dREiy0q2e1KN4RHRKE99g== Received: from qwe5 (qwe5.prod.google.com [10.241.194.5]) by wpaz29.hot.corp.google.com with ESMTP id o94N9bRE003850 for ; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:10:04 -0700 Received: by qwe5 with SMTP id 5so3631850qwe.26 for ; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:10:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=DsQ7iGmD6k7zXz0Hw1chHCr99mtQSJAtNXR1JtbdRgM=; b=HPryK1BlT5b9Ppgtv0D4FAk1NF0U4aA7qJAjXghuNyJCRLEG3Ftc28Laxv4BA3ydKF NRGNZ//ZTTqwkNeOl5pQ== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=google.com; s=beta; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=hsnwCoYOY1Zm5xafp2NVdwEsIBJcToua7nKHI6HlkpUSGg/uUl/6zZvlfUawqt8y6X muX5dDQsCcYDJaKTq2aQ== Received: by 10.229.216.16 with SMTP id hg16mr7541261qcb.55.1286233803613; Mon, 04 Oct 2010 16:10:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.210.12 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:09:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Jesse Wilson Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 16:09:43 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Commit to 5 or 6? To: Harmony Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00163631007df670b10491d2a469 X-System-Of-Record: true --00163631007df670b10491d2a469 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Harmony Folks, I'm planning to do some work on the Harmony 6 tests. I'm planning to do small improvements: isolating tests for security managers, replace assertTrue() with assertEquals(), etc. This work will be driven by me tryin= g to get Android's class library passing Harmony's tests as they appear in SVN. Currently we only run our own forked copy; that's lame and it doubles our maintenance burden. In which branch should I commit these changes? If I commit to the Java 5 branch, then the changes benefit both development trees. I'm not personally interested in Java 5 anymore, but I can't speak for everyone. But if I commit to the Java 6 branch, I can immediately take advantage of the changes. I don't want to think about Java 5 and I'm always running the complete set of Java 6 tests. Any guidance? Thanks. -- Android libcore team. office hours e= very afternoon, 1=E2=80=935pm --00163631007df670b10491d2a469--