harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3
Date Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:53:45 GMT
On 8 September 2010 12:35, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/Sep/2010 10:31, sebb wrote:
>> On 8 September 2010 08:52, Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> I have created signed source archives for revision r991881 of trunk and
>>> made them available at:
>>>
>>>  http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/milestones/6.0M3/
>>
>> The signing key has RSA key ID 8050390C.
>> Although it is listed in public key servers, it is not listed in
>>    http://www.apache.org/dist/harmony/KEYS
>> which is where all keys are supposed to be obtained, according to:
>>    http://harmony.apache.org/download.cgi#verify
>
> yeah, I got a copy from SVN, but I see Mark has now updated the dist
> copy too.
>
>> ---
>>
>> The top-level NOTICE file contains the following text:
>>
>> ====
>> The Apache Harmony Development Kit (HDK) contains a jar file from the
>> Apache Derby Project for which the following notice applies:
>>
>> Apache Derby
>> Copyright 2004-2007 The Apache Software Foundation
>>
>> This product includes software developed by
>> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>> ====
>>
>> I think this is superfluous, as the first few lines of the file should
>> be enough to cover ASF code.
>
> I don't follow your point here?  You think we should remove these lines,
> specifically, but presumably keep in the required attributions following
> that were passed through from our use of Derby, right?

I see now - ignore my comment.

>
>> ---
>>
>> The top-level LICENSE file refers to Apache Yoko (incubation).
>>
>> Apache Yoko is no longer part of the incubator; it has been dissolved,
>> and parts moved to Geronimo and CXF.
>> So long as Harmony is using the Geronimo or CXF code, there should be
>> no need to mention Yoko.
>> I don't know what the procedure is if Harmony is using the Yoko code
>> that remain in the Incubator; you should probably ask on
>> Legal-discuss.
>
> The code hasn't changed status, but I see there is a 1.1 release
> available now so let's add a TODO to move up to that and pick it up from
> Geronimo.
>
>> ---
>>
>> The following files don't have AL headers and are not listed in rat.excludes:
>>
>> classlib/doc/overview.html
>> classlib/modules/imageio/src/test/java/META-INF/services/javax.imageio.spi.CorrectProviderConfiguration
>> classlib/modules/imageio/src/test/java/META-INF/services/javax.imageio.spi.IncorrectProviderConfiguration
>> debian/README.Debian
>> debian/patches/01-ignore.suffix.on.samsa.tools.diff
>> debian/rules
>> drlvm/make/classlib.override.file.patterns
>> drlvm/vm/thread/src/doxyfile
>> ibm-v4/make/classlib.override.file.patterns
>>
>> Some of these files should probably have an AL header.
>
> I'm quite comfortable that there is no ambiguity here, so nothing to be
> concerned about.

Huh? What's ambiguous?

Either the file should have an AL header, in which case add the
header, otherwise add the exclusion.

> Thanks for the review.
>
> Regards,
> Tim
>
>>> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
>>> archives as 6.0 Milestone 3.
>>>
>>> This vote will be open for at least three days, or until all binding
>>> votes have been cast (if earlier).
>>>
>>> If the vote is successful, binary builds from these artifacts will be
>>> made available on the download page in addition to these source
>>> archives.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>  Mark.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message