harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jimmy,Jing Lv" <firep...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Build failed in Hudson: Harmony-1.6-head-linux-x86_64 #303
Date Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:04:08 GMT
Hi Mark,

    It would be fine.

2010/9/20 Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>

>
> In message <AANLkTikq9Fnp6WLidA8mYJH=b5v1dMheRPJTcX6RsE4o@mail.gmail.com>,
> "Jimmy,Jing Lv" writes:
> >
> >      Depends fixed.
>
> Actually, I missed your note and had already fixed the dependency in
> r998812 which adds the dependency to the x-tools module that uses ecj
> rather than at the top-level.  I am trying to move away from top-level
> dependencies so if you don't mind I'll revert your change r998819?
>
> Regards,
>  Mark.
>
> > 2010/9/20 Jimmy,Jing Lv <firepure@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >     I've committed the source and fixed the build.xml. However now
> > > it lacks ecj-3.5.1.jar to build. I find it in common-source but not
> > > in depends.  Will update it.
> > >
> > > 2010/9/20 Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>
> > >
> > >
> > >> In message <4C95F1C1.8010104@googlemail.com>, Oliver Deakin writes:
> > >> >
> > >> >   Hi Jimmy,
> > >> >
> > >> > It looks like the x-tools commit broke the build - I'm guessing
> > >> > the ecj jars need to be added to the compiler classpath?
> > >>
> > >> I don't think it is that simple.  It looks like it requires
> > >> javax.lang.model package to be implemented too or at least stubs?
> > >>
> > >> I've added a build.x.tools flag (that defaults to false) to allow
> > >> the builds to complete and progress to be made on fixing/testing
> > >> the new code.
> > >>
> > >> -Mark.
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > Best Regards!
> > >
> > > Jimmy, Jing Lv
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best Regards!
> >
> > Jimmy, Jing Lv
> > China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
>
>


-- 

Best Regards!

Jimmy, Jing Lv
China Software Development Lab, IBM

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message