harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Declare r991881 as 6.0 milestone 3
Date Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:13:03 GMT
On 08/Sep/2010 12:53, sebb wrote:
> On 8 September 2010 12:35, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 08/Sep/2010 10:31, sebb wrote:
>>> On 8 September 2010 08:52, Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>> I have created signed source archives for revision r991881 of trunk and
>>>> made them available at:
>>>>
>>>>  http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/milestones/6.0M3/
>>> The signing key has RSA key ID 8050390C.
>>> Although it is listed in public key servers, it is not listed in
>>>    http://www.apache.org/dist/harmony/KEYS
>>> which is where all keys are supposed to be obtained, according to:
>>>    http://harmony.apache.org/download.cgi#verify
>> yeah, I got a copy from SVN, but I see Mark has now updated the dist
>> copy too.
>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> The top-level NOTICE file contains the following text:
>>>
>>> ====
>>> The Apache Harmony Development Kit (HDK) contains a jar file from the
>>> Apache Derby Project for which the following notice applies:
>>>
>>> Apache Derby
>>> Copyright 2004-2007 The Apache Software Foundation
>>>
>>> This product includes software developed by
>>> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>> ====
>>>
>>> I think this is superfluous, as the first few lines of the file should
>>> be enough to cover ASF code.
>> I don't follow your point here?  You think we should remove these lines,
>> specifically, but presumably keep in the required attributions following
>> that were passed through from our use of Derby, right?
> 
> I see now - ignore my comment.
> 
>>> ---
>>>
>>> The top-level LICENSE file refers to Apache Yoko (incubation).
>>>
>>> Apache Yoko is no longer part of the incubator; it has been dissolved,
>>> and parts moved to Geronimo and CXF.
>>> So long as Harmony is using the Geronimo or CXF code, there should be
>>> no need to mention Yoko.
>>> I don't know what the procedure is if Harmony is using the Yoko code
>>> that remain in the Incubator; you should probably ask on
>>> Legal-discuss.
>> The code hasn't changed status, but I see there is a 1.1 release
>> available now so let's add a TODO to move up to that and pick it up from
>> Geronimo.
>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> The following files don't have AL headers and are not listed in rat.excludes:
>>>
>>> classlib/doc/overview.html
>>> classlib/modules/imageio/src/test/java/META-INF/services/javax.imageio.spi.CorrectProviderConfiguration
>>> classlib/modules/imageio/src/test/java/META-INF/services/javax.imageio.spi.IncorrectProviderConfiguration
>>> debian/README.Debian
>>> debian/patches/01-ignore.suffix.on.samsa.tools.diff
>>> debian/rules
>>> drlvm/make/classlib.override.file.patterns
>>> drlvm/vm/thread/src/doxyfile
>>> ibm-v4/make/classlib.override.file.patterns
>>>
>>> Some of these files should probably have an AL header.
>> I'm quite comfortable that there is no ambiguity here, so nothing to be
>> concerned about.
> 
> Huh? What's ambiguous?

Nothing, I said there was no ambiguity -- over the terms under which
people receive those files.

> Either the file should have an AL header, in which case add the
> header, otherwise add the exclusion.

+1

Regards,
Tim

>> Thanks for the review.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tim
>>
>>>> Please test these artifacts and then vote for declaring these source
>>>> archives as 6.0 Milestone 3.
>>>>
>>>> This vote will be open for at least three days, or until all binding
>>>> votes have been cast (if earlier).
>>>>
>>>> If the vote is successful, binary builds from these artifacts will be
>>>> made available on the download page in addition to these source
>>>> archives.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>  Mark.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
> 

Mime
View raw message