Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 29913 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2010 23:06:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 28 Jun 2010 23:06:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 84819 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 23:06:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 84766 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2010 23:06:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 84757 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2010 23:06:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:06:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aemiguel@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.174 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.174] (HELO mail-gy0-f174.google.com) (209.85.160.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:06:51 +0000 Received: by gyd12 with SMTP id 12so1150196gyd.19 for ; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:06:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0BcsgkkkPrttPpmTofHZwkF9YNmfz+mYoaVdYdYedrk=; b=wD487mTfMJ8ukQpBLpN58lJkeQ3vrEahNRc0DEEVehGwfbgF3aB9DTht+I1MnFfNyC kZYnx14zDXHVi5F93iRvDgSGHtVhZb5fsDnOHWTaIkmjy/mYruChYR0+t/Hre33hji7M 3yH+HkY3Fom+wx+Qt5dQM6nFwsn35dPcGXC/k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ON+AVW5iSgdxAFyWa24BjwA+JnDTzuBQ6Vj36SCsmm4o5cN4blCepS7S1xDvhFbbwo uSXYShgsSktdRptwq0JIw78QMoAdzguWikm5d6uvVL8/yaJUJyIkT3tioQuSlFLQTi29 dK9B7Uchqz14A1/0+1Zrhq2NvMu3Qy7f5DYVo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.158.39 with SMTP id k39mr7155699ano.203.1277766390251; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.213.11 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 16:06:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201006282233.o5SMXkLl017767@d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com> References: <201006282034.o5SKYdvu025180@d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <201006282055.o5SKtUuG025640@d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <201006282233.o5SMXkLl017767@d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:06:30 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [general] Windows 7 support From: Antony Miguel To: dev@harmony.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Mark, Thanks for the build but its giving me a "MSVCR71D.dll not found" error - I think thats because its a debug build and I dont have Visual Studio installed, any change of a release build? I'll grab the HDK once there is a release build available and run the tests and let you know. cheers A On 28 June 2010 23:33, Mark Hindess wrote: > > In message = , > Antony Miguel writes: >> >> 32-bit please :) > > http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/win7/ > > These are debug rather than release builds. =A0I'm happy to make release > builds if they are more suited to your requirements. =A0I've only made > java5 artifacts but let me know if you wanted java7. > > It would be useful if you could run the tests and report the results > back. =A0If you get the hdk build and unzip it you can run the tests with= : > > =A0ant -f harmony-5.0-hdk-958744/build/test/build.xml > > >> I believe XP->Vista broke with tradition much more Vista->Windows 7 so >> I would imagine if Harmony works on Vista then it would very likely >> work for the vast majority on Windows 7. >> >> As I've said I would suggest that that "it will probably work on >> future versions" should be the default assumption, or at least that >> the version check could be a warning which could be overridden with >> a command line switch? =A0That way you could retain the forced exit if >> you wished but people creating products on top of Harmony would have >> the option to use the command line switch in the knowledge that their >> products would work wherever possible and wouldn't just exit because >> Microsoft had released a new version. > > I don't disagree. =A0This change was easier for now. =A0Assuming the test > results are consistent on windows 7 then accepting dwMajorVersion >=3D > 6 is probably reasonable. =A0However, until we know if the tests run > correctly on windows 7, allowing versions greater than that doesn't > really make sense. > > Regards, > =A0Mark. > > >