Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 68686 invoked from network); 26 May 2010 10:02:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 May 2010 10:02:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 93168 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 10:02:08 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 93053 invoked by uid 500); 26 May 2010 10:02:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 93044 invoked by uid 99); 26 May 2010 10:02:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 10:02:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of t.p.ellison@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.49] (HELO mail-fx0-f49.google.com) (209.85.161.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 May 2010 10:01:58 +0000 Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so4475182fxm.36 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 03:01:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qMM4aZUNVONLIYKGxwNvAeWDeWjEcoiLYxhy7CgzqXQ=; b=EKg9tOAiH/5ca9K0LEro3fRPiO+lbL6xfzCVtIfAYpWbAaVXbA2GI5KTnvTwWTS2aG uK5FEzLgT0VfpCCyAErlfmvDJ/VVxYKHKZmRXQwQ9WqSP/YYqRqRhx17+gKHuxkQa9JK 5sWX+g0gdP0iJm6lBCOEylFnVdU9OGLHi79W0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=UWUtJtaNQ1J3Py6JmG8/SQ4bvBcnJti/hcery53bi5a680hX+ybO28hqvv9ATjuwsW ffvds4/dyaBzRSx33a3+wkzOeV0HUwNsyIcPe9sJHuKhvQs+ffYRkZt6r8GDnAfcKxdz WodXAZKp5jkHJ4GeFdrD1bZwzJxlTxp/x2wao= Received: by 10.223.92.152 with SMTP id r24mr7418327fam.74.1274868098010; Wed, 26 May 2010 03:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [9.20.183.78] (gbibp9ph1--blueice3n1.emea.ibm.com [195.212.29.83]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r12sm29280846fah.8.2010.05.26.03.01.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 26 May 2010 03:01:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BFCF132.8040601@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 11:00:18 +0100 From: Tim Ellison User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 26/May/2010 07:17, Jimmy,Jing Lv wrote: > 2010/5/25 sebb >> On 25/05/2010, Jimmy,Jing Lv wrote: >>> For the first milestone of Harmony-Select, I suggest we'd have >>> following criterion: >>> 1. build pass on both windows/linux platforms; >>> 2. pass all Harmony unit testcases in the selected module on these >>> platforms; >>> 3. Choose Apache Hadoop as a real Application test, pass its common test >> on >>> these platforms for the first milestone. >>> >>> Wait for any kindly suggestions, opinions and comments. >> May suggest using some of the Commons components as test cases? >> >> For example, Commons Lang, Math, IO, Net? >> >> I know that Math has exposed bugs in Harmony in the past. >> >> These are relatively small codebases, so it should be a lot easier to >> debug any failures. >> > > Hi, > > That's good suggestions, let's discuss the modules selection openly > according to the application requirements. > A silly question, as I haven't touched Commons yet, what is the > advantage in Commons Lang, Math, IO/Net than J2SE components? sebb was suggesting "using some of the Commons components as *test cases*" rather than replacing our current implementations. Running those tests will be useful to the SE 5/6 and Select runtimes. Regards, Tim