Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 194.196.100.161 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of mark.hindess@googlemail.com)
Message-Id: <201005271258.o4RCwKD7006066@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
In-reply-to: <201005271025.o4RAPPBb016255@d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
References: <AANLkTikWaissB0iBfAfI33UyYrqx5nuil9NJ-Yl0Tv5n@mail.gmail.com>
 <201005271025.o4RAPPBb016255@d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>
   message dated "Thu, 27 May 2010 11:25:25 +0100."
From: Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Harmony Select Milestone One
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 13:58:20 +0100


In message <201005271025.o4RAPPBb016255@d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>,
Mark Hindess writes:
> 
> [snip]
>
> However, the federated build for -Dhy.select=true currently fails
> because, for example, the "serialver -show" implementation requires
> some modules that aren't included in select.
> 
> I think we should consider how/what we want to subset from the jdktools
> component?  I think we need at least jdwp.  Some of the tools - jar
> for example - are thin wrappers around implementations that are in
> the select scope so I think it makes sense to include them too.
> 
> What do other people think?
> 
> While discussion continues, I intend to create a first approximation
> using the subset of all of jdktools that builds as I'd like to get
> select builds working on Apache Hudson.

I think I've fixed things so that the federated build should complete
with -Dhy.select=true now.  I'll look at setting up Hudson builds
shortly.

Something else we should do before we make milestone releases is
change the "java -version" output to make it obvious that select
is being used.

Regards,
 Mark.