From dev-return-39309-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Tue May 25 05:01:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 6373 invoked from network); 25 May 2010 05:01:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 May 2010 05:01:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 41779 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 05:01:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 41402 invoked by uid 500); 25 May 2010 05:01:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 41393 invoked by uid 99); 25 May 2010 05:01:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 05:01:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of junjie0122@gmail.com designates 209.85.161.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.161.49] (HELO mail-fx0-f49.google.com) (209.85.161.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 25 May 2010 05:01:07 +0000 Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so3101081fxm.36 for ; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:00:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hmB7JPFYWVGlAaasMj7LjJvq3Op9SaV7GtArFAODvGo=; b=SPSBmubv5HxT4RgqnWntEhPWO+3YH4KQZ6+rq4EvY4okyQvJzgNHkUpHIAq51oW5oH 5lZOmB1wYDuoS9oAqbmjnVMLSqZHugZwY/l5iT8oS4wx/EKxzl/lw2rGdcs21n07OsMx qZntpnC+baQX1mD4sm0D+UBlVDy5TVU5ptf9g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QiOxrbG6JIXRgmNpqDOHXvRtJyTRGFTxbAlR1NQP0+Pv5z40RwClpk+Khopnjm6aaj +UZKnBBKNIpd2W8ssQ9efLlqoVKLTGPiDD4kVVyXu3Fc44TSSEMaTNDBIWK2RCgVhkJV 7Aq8SuoObG/qwHgmQtOFgMxN/ghQnWun+FEP0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.143.12 with SMTP id s12mr5609189fau.9.1274763647042; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.121.12 with HTTP; Mon, 24 May 2010 22:00:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <201004211215.o3LCFRmv017217@d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <4BD59800.6080307@gmail.com> <201005080735.o487ZFET026264@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 13:00:47 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [general] Milestone releases, 5.0M14 and 6.0M2, proposed dates From: Jim Yu To: dev@harmony.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023545bd5905ac5a40487640a74 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0023545bd5905ac5a40487640a74 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Jimmy, As candidate builds for 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 are both available now. Maybe it is a good time to propose Harmony Select M1 at this moment:-) 2010/5/10 Jimmy,Jing Lv > Hi, > > 2010/5/8 Mark Hindess > > > > > In message < > j2u5c8e69f1005052010y45668507tb06c44f6d0a57390@mail.gmail.com > > >, > > "Jimmy,Jing Lv" writes: > > > > > > Hi Mark, > > > > > > It seems the date is near, do you think we can make a > > > Harmony-Select milestone release as well (though may not be possible > > > to have the same release data with harmony5/6 releases) ? > > > > Preparing the release artifacts for 2 releases and binary artifacts for > > 3 platforms and testing them all takes quite a lot of time. I don't > > have time to do the work necessary for another set but if you do have > > the time then that would be fine. However . . . > > > > Yup I'd like to. Let's see what time may be a good candidate. > > > > > Except the functionality unit-tests, I think we can bring some > > > open source project to have a test, e.g Hadoop, etc. > > > > At this point, I'd be far more interested in whether Hadoop (or any > > other Apache projects) work on the potential milestone releases. (As > > far as I know, from reading this list, no one has tested Hadoop on the > > federated trunk build yet?) Testing on a cut down Select build doesn't > > seem like a logical first step to me. > > > > Reasonable, maybe full Harmony SDK then Harmony Select is a better > solution, > however they don't conflict each other at least ;) > > > > Regards, > > Mark. > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best Regards! > > Jimmy, Jing Lv > China Software Development Lab, IBM > -- Best Regards, Jim, Jun Jie Yu --0023545bd5905ac5a40487640a74--