harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Yu <junjie0...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [general] Milestone releases, 5.0M14 and 6.0M2, proposed dates
Date Tue, 25 May 2010 05:00:47 GMT
Hi Jimmy,

As candidate builds for 5.0M14 and 6.0M2 are both available now. Maybe it is
a good time to propose Harmony Select M1 at this moment:-)

2010/5/10 Jimmy,Jing Lv <firepure@gmail.com>

> Hi,
>
> 2010/5/8 Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>
>
> >
> > In message <
> j2u5c8e69f1005052010y45668507tb06c44f6d0a57390@mail.gmail.com
> > >,
> > "Jimmy,Jing Lv" writes:
> > >
> > > Hi Mark,
> > >
> > >     It seems the date is near, do you think we can make a
> > > Harmony-Select milestone release as well (though may not be possible
> > > to have the same release data with harmony5/6 releases) ?
> >
> > Preparing the release artifacts for 2 releases and binary artifacts for
> > 3 platforms and testing them all takes quite a lot of time.  I don't
> > have time to do the work necessary for another set but if you do have
> > the time then that would be fine.  However . . .
> >
>
> Yup I'd like to. Let's see what time may be a good candidate.


> >
> > >     Except the functionality unit-tests, I think we can bring some
> > > open source project to have a test, e.g Hadoop, etc.
> >
> > At this point, I'd be far more interested in whether Hadoop (or any
> > other Apache projects) work on the potential milestone releases.  (As
> > far as I know, from reading this list, no one has tested Hadoop on the
> > federated trunk build yet?)  Testing on a cut down Select build doesn't
> > seem like a logical first step to me.
> >
>
> Reasonable, maybe full Harmony SDK then Harmony Select is a better
> solution,
> however they don't conflict each other at least ;)
>
>
> > Regards,
> >  Mark.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Best Regards!
>
> Jimmy, Jing Lv
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Jim, Jun Jie Yu

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message