harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ray Chen <clrayc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Declare r946981 as 6.0 milestone 2
Date Thu, 27 May 2010 09:34:11 GMT
OK, thanks.

So +1 for me.

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Mark Hindess
<mark.hindess@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> In message <AANLkTil0oxOyWIfNbMLDMuAcZElefYRaxJZ64t7G3dCf@mail.gmail.com>,
> Ray Chen writes:
>>
>> Built and tested on Linux/x86, following test failed.
>>
>> org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.Events.ClassPrepareTest (has been
>> disscussed above)
>> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.io.UnixFileTest
>> org.apache.harmony.nio.tests.java.nio.channels.SocketChannelTest
>>
>>
>> And
>> 1. org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.io.UnixFileTest passed when ran standalone
>>
>> 2. org.apache.harmony.nio.tests.java.nio.channels.SocketChannelTest
>> fails everytime:
>> SocketChannelTest     testSocket_Block_BasicStatusAfterConnect        Failure
>>       expected
>> not same
>> SocketChannelTest     testSocket_NonBlock_BasicStatusAfterConnect     Failure
>>       expected
>> not same
>>
>> Any one see this too?
>
> Yes.  See:
>
>  http://markmail.org/message/ludaacfqibu4mcrq
>
> I think we decided this assert was invalid.
>
> Thanks,
> -Mark
>
>
>



-- 
Regards,

Ray Chen

Mime
View raw message