From dev-return-39240-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Thu Apr 29 10:01:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 36344 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2010 10:01:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Apr 2010 10:01:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 39427 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 10:01:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 39348 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2010 10:01:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 39320 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2010 10:01:06 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:01:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of wanglg9711@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.49] (HELO mail-gw0-f49.google.com) (74.125.83.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:00:59 +0000 Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so1714961gwb.36 for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:00:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PEojRqegheraLSayQlaZtVw+K8ca9UBhbgZH4duhhCg=; b=QvwDxIQDs/j8ZM8bMcxGy5xn6rC8EiYhVPCTnmOh6bNt9CtspeIbG5EZmzlwTxqHxs dUF5tpHxWNBW/taftZmiHfuRNmCItIABDfHPcy5DhDMEVAFM5Lk5g0eZJE03WKnWSDOr AZx2pzGAefJCpXTHfCHJrseXCvxCXVvFBPWzc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=LSwyKsoInygHkhz9UcE5hZxOD5TYkFaiNWc6SrDiqfo9NJRlk5ZoawIqrrC+IrZrDc KBaB6Tko+KfEOzM1xcYKqbMwdXiyiaEZ3rt9V43pyrPGPx8URK2iJkfVTtXXclHlmha/ Q4l7P+xtzGbYcBRHqwz6VbbmWGNkp9XfS2Uno= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.8.28 with SMTP id 28mr265296agh.63.1272535238932; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:00:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.75.7 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Apr 2010 03:00:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201004261200038274554@gmail.com> References: <201004261200038274554@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:00:38 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [drlvm][gc]: UNIQUE MARK SWEEP gc failed when running specjvm2008 From: Ligang Wang To: dev@harmony.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016361e7b90e179a004855d32c5 --0016361e7b90e179a004855d32c5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Dennis, With what sub-benchmark did you meet this problem? Some sub-benchmarks require large heap. You configuration should have no problem. Btw, what is the symptom? Thanks, Ligang On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, dennis.xlc wrote: > Hi all, > I've just tried to run specjvm2008 using UNIQUE MARK SWEEP gc but > failed. > > I just uncomment the macro USE_UNIQUE_MARK_SWEEP_GC, and use comand line > like: > java -XX:gc.unique_algorithm=MARK_SWEEP ... > > Is there something wrong with my configure or the unique mark sweep does > NOT work when running specjvm2008? > > Regards, > > Dennis > -- Ligang Wang China Runtime Technologies Lab, SSG/SSD/MRTC, Intel --0016361e7b90e179a004855d32c5--