Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 14440 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2010 16:36:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Mar 2010 16:36:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 52772 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 16:36:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 52659 invoked by uid 500); 25 Mar 2010 16:36:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 52650 invoked by uid 99); 25 Mar 2010 16:36:49 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:36:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of alexei.fedotov@gmail.com designates 72.14.220.159 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.159] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.159) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 16:36:43 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so2932108fga.0 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:36:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=y6uTHrIll6PfP6THuilImJ885VWeMzj+Mc+4NnaPl5I=; b=bS0kB0m7Amt+m0hxim8bAxnGpDI4tDhqm3aVzvcq+Fb7dg20RboRU0A6w/9keRtH7l jVx4CsUZkakUkjVzzKoT5BnK54o43R2v56k0HiT/2qTK8VghTlBt8jMhun6FtfCOn3tH HR/HNF3DHTmMB4g4FH4orkh+UCUOWMzA6xSZo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dHSmhg35EbZNjBaAUmapRhD/DcuSGN+SKqmec5zTfpVhgXhq9TP8XiY+KY7dx/QFPj tllX26RzF2cqrhALGaAmWcjd8cqorbvfexKidKT5esnz/qZeHEZzHDaK6Hlc46qkvx3k fVjEh6uLBsj+LXI101vSC8VGFTIG4gm+Cnps8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.183.74 with SMTP id t10mr1393539hbg.85.1269534983114; Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:36:23 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <260c43601003242028w58013a82haeed65a4e138bea0@mail.gmail.com> <201003251456.o2PEuUfW020208@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:36:23 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GSoc]HARMONY-6447 - Implement missing functionality in imageio module From: Alexei Fedotov To: dev@harmony.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I have checked the patch, and JIRA. Could I assume ACQ is in place? -- With best regards / =D3 =CE=C1=C9=CC=D5=DE=DB=C9=CD=C9 =D0=CF=D6=C5=CC=C1= =CE=C9=D1=CD=C9, Alexei Fedotov / =E1=CC=C5=CB=D3=C5=CA =E6=C5=C4=CF=D4=CF=D7, http://www.telecom-express.ru/ http://harmony.apache.org/ http://dataved.ru/ http://klsh.ru/ 2010/3/25 Alexei Fedotov : > I can join as a co-mentor for the project. > > -- > With best regards / =D3 =CE=C1=C9=CC=D5=DE=DB=C9=CD=C9 =D0=CF=D6=C5=CC=C1= =CE=C9=D1=CD=C9, > Alexei Fedotov / =E1=CC=C5=CB=D3=C5=CA =E6=C5=C4=CF=D4=CF=D7, > http://www.telecom-express.ru/ > http://harmony.apache.org/ > http://dataved.ru/ http://klsh.ru/ > > > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Mark Hindess > wrote: >> >> In message <260c43601003242028w58013a82haeed65a4e138bea0@mail.gmail.com>= , >> Yang Lang writes: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> My name is Lang Yang, a final year Software Engineering student >>> at University of Regina, Canada. I want to pick up task >>> HARMONY-6447, >>> [classlib] [imageio] Implement missing functionality in imageio >>> module, as my Google Summer of Code project. According to Mark's >>> description, the task is to implement the missing spec'd functionality >>> and write unit tests to ensure the implementation behaves correctly >>> (Thanks Mark:)). >>> >>> The JAPI result shows there are totally 41 methods are not implemented >>> (I have already submitted a patch that has implemented 4 of the >>> methods). By look into the code, I found out that only few APIs have >>> unit test case. The implementations of some image format plug-ins are >>> also missing from the code (like BMP plug-in). >> >> Thank you for your interest and contribution. >> >> I've committed your first patch so the JAPI results are already >> improving. =9AI've made a set for just the javax.imageio packages and ke= pt >> a copy of the results from before you started contributing. =9AI'll upda= te >> it periodically. =9ASee: >> >> =9Ahttp://people.apache.org/~hindessm/imageio-japi/ >> >> Looking at the sun50 and sun60 results shows that there are two new >> methods in java6 that are also missing: >> >> =9Ajavax.imageio.ImageIO.getReaderFileSuffixes() >> =9Ajavax.imageio.ImageIO.getWriterFileSuffixes() >> >> It would be good to implement those for the java6 branch too. >> >>> My personal expectation for this task will be implementing and test >>> the issues I have addressed above. It seems there is no mentor >>> assigned to this task yet. I wonder if anyone wants to be my mentor on >>> this task. >> >> Any volunteers? >> >> Regards, >> =9AMark. >> >> >> >