harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Hindess <mark.hind...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [general] Release process (was [result][vote]Declare r917296 as 6.0M1)
Date Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:32:54 GMT

In message <3b3f27c61003091615v35532a30xc24cf282e7e69599@mail.gmail.com>, Natha
n Beyer writes:
>
> On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Mark Hindess
> <mark.hindess@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > In message <4B965407.8000609@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
> >>
> >> I appreciate sebb's review and comments.  It would have been good
> >> to hear them during the two week freeze leading up to the vote
> >> rather than after the vote was concluded :-)
> >
> > This comment isn't entirely fair.  Sebb's initial review comments
> > were about the binaries which we only created after the release was
> > "completed".  This is one reason why I had more sympathy for his
> > view that the release should be cancelled.
> >
> > I also appreciate sebb's comments.  So, while he could have made them
> > by building our source and reviewing the resulting binaries, perhaps
> > we should attempt to make this kind of review easier?
>
> Don't we have binary builds coming out of Hudson periodically?

Indeed.  Though they are built from svn directly rather than from svn
via source artifacts, so I worry we'd miss something that would affect
the release.

-Mark.



Mime
View raw message