Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of clraychen@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.211.172 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=DuCJa0JAQFN07oxHyYuYkXyQhF+vF9uJ+HSZK6eSfyEzk3GNPt/sgjcrQ5m0O1Taeb
         INnIDxjrqS5cufQFH1uBreQsOpnmeLAoHp4k26dP6V5c0OkpxFT1fQjElx6uti+VcXcA
         HmBGiU9wTbOUb1yjXmu4yfvytQ+d80gJvq/0I=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201002241308.o1OD8sIq021164@d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
References: <201002232036.o1NKa7t0016026@d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
	 <201002241308.o1OD8sIq021164@d06av04.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:22:11 +0800
Message-ID: <4d9fb1a01002241822k7657513cmef15c809001ecb9d@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [6.0M1] tests on linux/x86 (was [5.0M13] test results on
	linux/x86)
From: Ray Chen <clraychen@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,
I see org.apache.harmony.auth.tests.javax.security.auth.kerberos.KerberosTi=
cketTest
org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.VirtualMachine.ReleaseEventsTest
failed with timeout error

org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.MulticastSocketTest failed everytime

and some other swing tests failed.

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Mark Hindess
<mark.hindess@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> In message <201002232036.o1NKa7t0016026@d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>,
> "Mark Hindess" writes:
>>
>> On linux/x86, I see a number of consistent failures. =A0In particular:
>>
>> =A0 org.apache.harmony.tests.java.lang.instrument.HelloWorldTest
>> =A0 =A0 which is covered by a JIRA and another thread
>>
>> =A0 org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.io.PipedInputStreamTest
>> =A0 =A0 which is unstable but much improved with r915503
>>
>> I see a number of other intermittent failures but nothing I've not
>> seen before. =A0I also see a number of non-regression timeouts in awt
>> and swing.
>>
>> I don't see any of these as blockers.
>
> I see similar results on linux/x86 with the java6 branch the only major
> difference is that the JDWP tests seem less stable[0] and the java6-only
> tests:
>
> =A0UnixFileTest.test_get*Space
>
> are unstable on a busy machine (perhaps they should require less
> accuracy)?
>
>> Anyone else got any results?
>
> Anyone?
>
> Regards,
> =A0Mark
>
> [0] I think the jdwp tests are less stable because of timing issues and
> =A0 =A0the timing is worse (faster?) on the java6 branch.
>
>
>


--=20
Regards,

Ray Chen