Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 194.196.100.167 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of mark.hindess@googlemail.com)
Message-Id: <201002101432.o1AEW7lG018195@d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
In-reply-to: <201002101235.o1ACZ9MJ007644@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
References: <70c070d81002091921w43f62f6qc3d77f48db650c6a@mail.gmail.com>
 <201002101131.o1ABV42Q010183@d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
 <70c070d81002100402m5e80cab1r6e63639a8944b52e@mail.gmail.com>
 <201002101235.o1ACZ9MJ007644@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>
   message dated "Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:35:09 +0000."
From: Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: About the newest version of lockfree ReferenceQueue
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:32:07 +0000


In message <201002101235.o1ACZ9MJ007644@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>,
Mark Hindess writes:
>
> In message <70c070d81002100402m5e80cab1r6e63639a8944b52e@mail.gmail.com>,
> James Gan writes:
> >
> > Mark,
> > 
> > Thanks a lot!
> > 
> > It seems that I used the wrong tool to generate the patch. Sorry for
> > the confusing that I made.
> > 
> > I'll create a new patch and return here after two weeks.
> 
> Excellent.  I've managed to make use of the current patch because the
> changes are widespread enough that you can cut the new code directly out
> of the patch if you strip the first two characters of each line.
> 
> You should still make the clean patch since understanding the expected
> workflow will help speed up the evaluation of future contributions and
> I'd like to check that I'm making the changes as you intended.

Using your new versions of these two classes causes DRLVM to crash so I
will have to wait until you have a new patch.

-Mark.