harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oliver Deakin <oliver.dea...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [java6][M1] Test failures on the java 6 branch
Date Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:15:24 GMT
On 17/02/2010 14:43, Mark Hindess wrote:
> In message<4B7BEE13.70001@googlemail.com>, Oliver Deakin writes:
>> Hi all,
>> Looking forward to the next attempt at getting java6 M1 out the door, I
>> ran the full test suite on Windows XP x86 and see 5 failures and 10
>> errors. I'll raise JIRAs for the ones below I think will need looking at
>> for java6 M1.
>> I don't think these failures should block M1:
>> javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicScrollBarUITest - this has been failing for
>> a while now and passes standalone, also fails/passes on java5 in the
>> same way so I don't think it should block M1.
>> org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.Events.FieldModification002Test and
>> org.apache.harmony.jpda.tests.jdwp.VirtualMachine.AllThreadsTest - both
>> timeouts. We see intermittent timeouts in the java5 branch also (even
>> though the JDWP implementation is somewhat different there) so I think
>> these are caused by timing issues in the test cases.
>> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.URLConnectionTest - fails for me
>> intermittently and on java5 also, I don't think this is a blocker.
>> I think these could block M1:
>> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.util.TreeMapTest - 8 errors here, all
>> NullPointerExceptions. These are more worrying and I think they need to
>> be investigated for M1. [1]
>> org.apache.harmony.tests.java.lang.instrument.HelloWorldTest - 3
>> failures, two with "expected:<0>  but was:<3>" and the last one with
>> "AssertionFailedError: null". These fail on java5 also for me and have
>> been discussed on the dev list [2]. I think they need a JIRA to track
>> them so I've opened [3].
>> Does anyone else see similar failures (particularly the TreeMap and
>> instrument ones)?
> Yes.  I've reverted the change that causes the TreeMap ones in r910980.
> See:
>    http://markmail.org/thread/cdxlmi26mjgor3om
> for more information.
> I've committed r910685 yesterday evening so now you should be able to
> look at the output for these tests to get a better idea of the source of
> the problem.

Thanks. I'll make sure the failing tests now pass on my build.

> I don't think we should block on the instrument failures as they are
> new tests and not regressions as such but still it would be nice to fix
> them.


> Oddly, the tests pass when I (accidentally) run an x86 build on
> x86_64 even though the same build fails on x86.

That is odd. I haven't looked closely at this failure yet, but as you 
say I don't think it should be a blocker for M13/M1.


> Regards,
> -Mark.

Oliver Deakin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU

View raw message