Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of clraychen@gmail.com designates
 209.85.211.176 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=V/MDR9pcWTGtNlnZ6NREfgsPWyXLwc6IzOQwFv5xPDx2Ftleiz+/ds9gw4YAKsxpy/
         ImDwPvvAjwV0/1CR4OXCBYaDi/lYI7ukscoUDphT4QmTq0UkKb+h5DIwniAGYF1UWKwb
         SqyrcifhaZEu+Rr3agCvbWgHpwV9oApncWC1o=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201001200947.o0K9lxZx026868@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
References: <201001200947.o0K9lxZx026868@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:54:51 +0800
Message-ID: <4d9fb1a01001200154u780476d6k570d6bb3516ba880@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Postpone java6 milestone release
From: Ray Chen <clraychen@gmail.com>
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Mark,
I have a question, what conditions should java6 satisfy so that we can
release it?All the tests passed? :)


On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Mark Hindess
<mark.hindess@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Since we are not making much progress towards a java6 milestone release
> and the code has been frozen for much too long, I think we should
> abandon the idea and postpone the release until we do the next java5
> milestone.
>
> If no one speaks up against this, then I will send a mail declaring the
> code freeze over tomorrow.
>
> I'm not convinced having the milestones offset by a week really helps
> much and suggest that next time we do a milestone release for java5 we
> do a java6 release at the same time. =A0(I'm not convinced this will work
> either but it can't really be worse so I think we should try it.)
>
> What do you think?
>
> -Mark.
>
>
>


--=20
Regards,

Ray Chen