Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of xu.regis@gmail.com designates
 209.85.221.200 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=qWVOLXvmnPTo3iQvjV/bHiCtVIwJQardJ9Q2m7MgR91+f9+YATue94GW7FThyBE3Na
         vD1PgHIiISS5FMA6q2TJU/mxpuxvwtg6NJr/vpt5nDXhCTais7FEi26pECQGhNRTEgEm
         Cv+GdZPVmW/jx7POhSeJwfyya+4AdK7PuVt24=
Message-ID: <4B4AE275.7030206@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:33:57 +0800
From: Regis <xu.regis@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
 rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: 6.0 Milestone testing -windowsXP-32
References: <4d9fb1a00912180321k21c1af7eibf50070ad93e937e@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4d9fb1a01001062322m53dfa13uccb8ed9a1a92871b@mail.gmail.com>
 <4d9fb1a01001102201s60da5770gb04ed84720beca9d@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4d9fb1a01001102201s60da5770gb04ed84720beca9d@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2010-01-11 14:01, Ray Chen wrote:
> Hi all,
> For javax.swing.text.html.HTMLDocument_Reader_ActionsTest (1 failure
> and 1 error)
> I compared two swing.jar of trunk and java6, the only difference
> between them is that java6 added some new classes:
>
> javax\swing\event\RowSorterEvent$Type.class
> javax\swing\event\RowSorterEvent.class
> javax\swing\event\RowSorterListener.class
> javax\swing\filechooser\FileNameExtensionFilter.class
> javax\swing\RowSorter$SortKey.class
> javax\swing\RowSorter.class
> javax\swing\SortOrder.class
>
> I think these classes are not related to this test. However, even
> after I removed these new added classes or replaced trunk's swing.jar
> with java6's swing.jar and run the test on the modified trunk , the
> test still failed.
> And trunk's swing.jar works well in both trunk and java6 to run this test.
> So I am a little confused,  same classes, same vm, why different result?
>
> One more thing, although java6 only added a few classes in swing
> module, the swing.jar is much bigger than trunk's (java6 5.11MB and
> trunk 2.38MB on my machine).
> I also found that java6's boot folder is much bigger than trunk's,
> about 11MB bigger.
> Did we really add "11MB" new features, or there is something wrong?

I think java6 is missing <property name="hy.jar.compress" value="true" /> in 
make/properties.xml, so all the jars are not compressed.

I propose to apply patch [1] to java6, that can significant reduce our build 
size as Ray mentioned before.

[1]
Index: make/properties.xml
=====================================================================
--- make/properties.xml
+++ make/properties.xml
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
      <property name="hy.javac.source" value="1.5" />
      <property name="hy.javac.target" value="1.5" />
      <property name="hy.javac.maxmem" value="384M" />
+    <property name="hy.jar.compress" value="true" />

      <!-- Temporarily always include class file debug info -->
      <condition property="hy.javac.debug" value="on" else="on">


-- 
Best Regards,
Regis.