harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From regis xu <xu.re...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-6420) [test] Increase the method coverage rate for unit test
Date Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:55:32 GMT
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Mark Hindess
<mark.hindess@googlemail.com>wrote:

>
> In message
> <3b3f27c61001192003j58c669f2m2fa8cb94acadfe96@mail.gmail.com>, Nathan
> Beyer writes:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Ray Chen <clraychen@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I think it is EMMA's report.
> >
> > I was able to figure out that.
>
> :-)
>
> > > Maybe we should find a place to put these reports. So we can know
> > > exactly what test coverage rate we have got for each module
> >
> > It's the integration into the build system that's of interest.
>
> I've temporarily placed a copy of the baseline results at:
>
>   http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/emma/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ehindessm/emma/>
>
> But I strongly agree with Nathan, it would be very, very helpful to get
> this work integrated with the rest of the build system.  In particular,
> it would then enable us to make use of the hudson emma plugin so we have
> regular reports and can track progress.
>
> I'm happy to help to achieve this goal.  Perhaps as a first step, the
> current method for producing the report could be documented/described?
>
> Regards,
>  Mark.
>
>
> [1] describe the details. And Sean have done some work to integrate Emma to
BTI [2], but I'm not clear about the current status.

[1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/coverageEMMA
[2] http://markmail.org/thread/3vqgijetuieh2a2a

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message