harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ray Chen <clrayc...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jira] Commented: (HARMONY-6420) [test] Increase the method coverage rate for unit test
Date Wed, 20 Jan 2010 02:30:08 GMT
I think it is EMMA's report.  Maybe we should find a place to put
these reports. So we can know exactly what test coverage rate we have
got for each module

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Nathan Beyer (JIRA) <jira@apache.org> wrote:
>
>    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802604#action_12802604
]
>
> Nathan Beyer commented on HARMONY-6420:
> ---------------------------------------
>
> I'm curious about how you gathered the coverage data? That would a valuable contribution
on it's own.
>
>> [test] Increase the method coverage rate for unit test
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>                 Key: HARMONY-6420
>>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6420
>>             Project: Harmony
>>          Issue Type: Test
>>          Components: Classlib
>>    Affects Versions: 5.0M12
>>            Reporter: Jim Yu
>>             Fix For: 5.0M13
>>
>>         Attachments: baseline-report.zip, Result-report.zip
>>
>>
>> I recently generated a coverage report for Harmony trunk and would like to contribute
more test cases to increase the method coverage rate for it. Currently, these patches are
made for the main modules as below. After applying these patches, the average method coverage
rate for these modules can reach 90% above. I also attached the reports of the baseline and
the result with patches.
>> java.io
>> java.lang
>> java.lang.instrument
>> java.lang.reflect
>> javax.print.*
>> java.net
>> java.util
>> javax.sql.*
>> javax.acessibility
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
>
>



-- 
Regards,

Ray Chen

Mime
View raw message