Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79870 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2009 10:05:04 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 19 Dec 2009 10:05:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 22479 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2009 10:05:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 22386 invoked by uid 500); 19 Dec 2009 10:05:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 22375 invoked by uid 99); 19 Dec 2009 10:05:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:05:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gcjhd-harmony-dev@m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.12 as permitted sender) Received: from [80.91.229.12] (HELO lo.gmane.org) (80.91.229.12) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:04:53 +0000 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NLwAn-00027V-Qp for dev@harmony.apache.org; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:04:29 +0100 Received: from packo.static.corbina.ru ([78.107.249.77]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:04:29 +0100 Received: from egor.pasko by packo.static.corbina.ru with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:04:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: dev@harmony.apache.org From: Egor Pasko Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (HARMONY-6404) possible data-reordering in some hashCode-methods (e.g. String or URL) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:04:05 +0300 Lines: 26 Message-ID: <87pr6bwa96.fsf@gmail.com> References: <981540465.1260477018418.JavaMail.jira@brutus> <4B21BE3A.4030202@gmail.com> <6554f93c0912102009n45e4981btfc072f0c6feacca7@mail.gmail.com> <4B221ABA.4040809@gmail.com> <87638doa25.fsf@gmail.com> <4B226D80.4040309@gmail.com> <3b3f27c60912112000h7c52613ajbbc9692150a3a44e@mail.gmail.com> <871vj0o42m.fsf@gmail.com> <4B29FA62.2050801@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: packo.static.corbina.ru User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bcCimU/FFZ/U1dWd30KfCs0Eqgk= Sender: news On the 0x68A day of Apache Harmony Tim Ellison wrote: > On 12/Dec/2009 10:54, Egor Pasko wrote: >> On the 0x685 day of Apache Harmony Nathan Beyer wrote: > >>> In any case, it does seem a pinch more efficient to only do one read >>> of hashCode ... switch up the code to be something like this. >>> >>> public int hashCode() { >>> final int hash = hashCode; >>> if (hash == 0) { >>> if (count == 0) { >>> return 0; >>> } >>> for (int i = offset; i < count + offset; i++) { >>> hash = value[i] + ((hash << 5) - hash); >>> } >>> hashCode = hash; >> >> one more 'return hash' here, please :) > > Why? argh, what was I thinking about? the original Nathan's code is great. -- Egor Pasko