harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nathan Beyer <ndbe...@apache.org>
Subject Re: java 6 branch -version reports 1.5.0?
Date Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:28:34 GMT
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Tony Wu <wuyuehao@gmail.com> wrote:
> will the two ways result in different testing results?
>

Yeah! The old way basically doesn't work ... i was just testing the trunk.

> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Nathan Beyer <ndbeyer@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Mark Hindess
>> <mark.hindess@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> In message <3b3f27c60912101902u5c49e5c2o3b7fb9f300833b84@mail.gmail.com>,
>>> Nathan Beyer writes:
>>>>
>>>> I've been doing testing on the java 6 branch and was looking over the
>>>> results and noticed that the version info reports 1.5.0 ... I thought
>>>> we did something about that? I think I have the build setup correctly,
>>>> though maybe not.
>>>
>>> There are two ways to build the java6 branch.  The "old" way is:
>>>
>>>  svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/trunk hy6
>>>  cd hy6
>>>  ant -Djava6=true populate-src
>>>  ant -Djava6=true
>>>
>>> and the new way:
>>>
>>>  svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/harmony/enhanced/branches/java6 hy6
>>>  cd hy6
>>>  ant populate-src
>>>  ant
>>>
>>> I suspect that you are using the "old" way and not supplying the
>>> -Djava6=true parameter to the build.  (Previously the -Djava6=true
>>> parameter only affected the populate-src target but now it affects the
>>> build too.)
>>>
>>> I think we should deprecate/remove the "old" way to avoid this confusion.
>>
>> Oh ... let me try that. Yes, we should remove any "old" ways.
>>
>>>
>>> -Mark.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tony Wu
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>

Mime
View raw message