harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jesse Wilson <jessewil...@google.com>
Subject Re: Doubting exception priority compatibility
Date Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:15:20 GMT
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Being consistent on checked exceptions like IOException is still
> beneficial,
> and we should continue to maintain our current behaviour.
> Being consistent ... on throwing priority?  So you are suggesting that
> we continue to enforce priority order for multiple errors resulting in
> exceptions outside the set above?
> Just trying to understand precisely what you are proposing.

My focusing on a specific set of exceptions makes more complicated than
necessary; sorry about that. Ultimately I agree with the RI's decision that
it is bogus to either specify or enforce a particular exception priority.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message