Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98900 invoked from network); 14 Oct 2009 14:51:19 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Oct 2009 14:51:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 87707 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 14:51:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 87635 invoked by uid 500); 14 Oct 2009 14:51:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 87624 invoked by uid 99); 14 Oct 2009 14:51:18 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:51:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 195.212.29.138 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mark.hindess@googlemail.com) Received: from [195.212.29.138] (HELO mtagate5.uk.ibm.com) (195.212.29.138) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:51:15 +0000 Received: from d06nrmr1806.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1806.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.39.193]) by mtagate5.uk.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n9EEnrtd423762 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:49:58 GMT Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.213]) by d06nrmr1806.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n9EEngKP1151096 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:49:43 +0100 Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n9EEngjT002188 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:49:42 +0100 Received: from anaheim.local (dhcp-9-20-183-186.hursley.ibm.com [9.20.183.186]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n9EEng6Y002182 for ; Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:49:42 +0100 Message-Id: <200910141449.n9EEng6Y002182@d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 (debian 1:2.7.2-18) with nmh-1.3 In-reply-to: <4AD44AB0.4050404@gmail.com> References: <20091013073556.C392623888FF@eris.apache.org> <4AD4385D.8030601@gmail.com> <4AD44AB0.4050404@gmail.com> Comments: In-reply-to Regis message dated "Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:38:56 +0800." From: Mark Hindess To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r824625 - in /harmony/enhanced/classlib/trunk/modules/nio/src: main/java/common/org/apache/harmony/nio/internal/SelectorImpl.java test/java/common/org/apache/harmony/nio/tests/java/nio/channels/SelectorTest.java Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 15:49:42 +0100 In message <4AD44AB0.4050404@gmail.com>, Regis writes: > > Regis wrote: > > regisxu@apache.org wrote: > > > > This commit is incorrect and causes SelectorTest failed on Windows, > > I'll fix it soon. > > > Fixed at r824652. I found SelectorTest is in exclude list of linux, > but it passes on my linux machine. It excluded in HARMONY-4116, does > anyone can reproduce this issue? I ran the test 100 times on linux/x86_64 with no failures. Wondering if it was a port selection problem (it is using the doomed-to-intermittent-failure Support_PortManager), I ran 100 times in parallel on two sessions on linux/x86. I saw no failures. If I'd have stopped here I'd probably have been happy. But a further 100 runs on x86 on debian oldstable (etch) had one crash out of 100 runs with the following stack trace: Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 0xf7f986e7 in _dl_rtld_di_serinfo () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (gdb) bt #0 0xf7f986e7 in _dl_rtld_di_serinfo () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #1 0xf7f98b07 in _dl_rtld_di_serinfo () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #2 0xf7f9c2f9 in _dl_rtld_di_serinfo () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #3 0xf7f9c090 in _dl_rtld_di_serinfo () from /lib/ld-linux.so.2 #4 0xf7f4a7f1 in port_thread_set_priority (os_thread=3592702896, priority=5) at /home/hindessm/hy/fed.x86/working_vm/vm/port/src/thread/linux/thread_os.c:519 #5 0xf7f47ba1 in hythread_set_priority (thread=0x8f32ae8, priority=5) at /home/hindessm/hy/fed.x86/working_vm/vm/thread/src/thread_native_attrs.c:41 #6 0xf7f44a1b in hythread_wrapper_start_proc (arg=0x8f34c40) at /home/hindessm/hy/fed.x86/working_vm/vm/thread/src/thread_native_basic.c:804 #7 0xf7f49d0c in thread_start_func (arg=0x8f34c40) at /home/hindessm/hy/fed.x86/working_vm/vm/port/src/thread/linux/thread_os.c:106 #8 0xf7cc20bd in start_thread () from /lib/tls/libpthread.so.0 #9 0xf7eb201e in clone () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6 This is unlikely to relate to the HARMONY-4116 issue. Regards, -Mark.