Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sean.xx.qiu@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.222.199 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=TK3ksiH7a7+N0OLvMTMcbhMswU+WZ+Ff78bDS7sb3ebCrjgBdqT6oBPw8cj8Pwt7QA
         cSzQEvbZ+ABD34u1MT4VFM/eqYRajXOJ6v89+Xve73YdQzAIe1cYxkzFNuTiu7Tl+rY5
         wDHhBAKOKfDlC99PrcbmtPmZfcRGY8KyxJlHk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <200908312132.n7VLW0Ic023675@d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
References: <200908312132.n7VLW0Ic023675@d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>
From: Sean Qiu <sean.xx.qiu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:39:16 +0800
Message-ID: <94d710af0908312139u597fb099v575f5965578f1f13@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [general] [build] java6 snapshot artifact names
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Cool, thanks, Mark.

Best Regards
Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu


2009/9/1 Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>:
>
> The federated build tree is still frozen pending voting on a 6.0M1
> release. =A0I made some source artifacts to vote on but then I decided
> that I'd rather like to apply the attached patch before making this
> release (and any further 5.0 milestone releases come to that).
>
> It adds 6.0 to the names for the various artifacts produced by the build,
> so the source to vote on will be:
>
> =A0apache-harmony-6.0-src-r808452-snapshot.tar.gz and
> =A0apache-harmony-6.0-src-r808452-snapshot.zip
>
> rather than:
>
> =A0apache-harmony-src-r808452-snapshot.tar.gz and
> =A0apache-harmony-src-r808452-snapshot.zip
>
> which would be indistinguishable from artifacts created from a java5
> tree.
>
> It also changes the name of the directory that the binary artifacts
> extract into to include the java version in the name as well.
>
> Do any other committers approve (or disapprove) of this patch?
>
> Regards,
> =A0Mark.
>