Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90759 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2009 14:30:30 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2009 14:30:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 73843 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 14:30:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 73784 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 14:30:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 73773 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2009 14:30:36 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:30:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.8 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 195.212.29.153 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mark.hindess@googlemail.com) Received: from [195.212.29.153] (HELO mtagate4.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.153) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:30:24 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate4.de.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7EETr0g194856 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:29:53 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n7EETr0D1597510 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:29:53 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n7EETqe8013254 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:29:52 +0200 Received: from anaheim.local (sig-9-146-169-212.uk.ibm.com [9.146.169.212]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n7EETqrh013243 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:29:52 +0200 Message-Id: <200908141429.n7EETqrh013243@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 (debian 1:2.7.2-16) with nmh-1.2 In-reply-to: <200908141301.n7ED1S29019805@d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com> References: <200908071056.n77AuVAr021972@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <200908141301.n7ED1S29019805@d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Comments: In-reply-to Mark Hindess message dated "Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:01:27 +0100." From: Mark Hindess To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [classlib][awt] Dependencies for windows Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:29:51 +0100 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org In message <200908141301.n7ED1S29019805@d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com>, Mark Hindess writes: > > In message <200908071056.n77AuVAr021972@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>, > "Mark Hindess" writes: > > > > In commit r801941, I've split the awt dependencies downloads for > > windows into separate tar files (three for each of x86 and x86_64). > > The content is the same as the previous downloads so there should be > > no behaviour difference. I tested on x86 but x86_64 is very similar > > now so that should be okay. If no one beats me to it I hope to test > > x86_64 next week. I did this because: > > > > 1) I wanted to make it easier to upgrade the dependencies independently > > (for the reasons mentioned in http://markmail.org/message/uggbm4jahqsgy7kf > ) > > I've done this for x86 but not x86_64. I'll do x86_64 as soon as I can > find a machine to build on but I really wanted to get x86 fixed for M11. > I'll get an x86_64 machine sorted out soon but probably not in time for > M11 but we haven't been releasing x86_64 windows builds anyway so that > shouldn't be a problem. Actually, Tim pointed out that this broke the build (or pick up old dependencies) so I've reverted this but willfix it properly shortly. -Mark.