Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-37635-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 88174 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2009 09:18:07 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Jul 2009 09:18:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 53881 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 09:18:16 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org
Received: (qmail 53822 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2009 09:18:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@harmony.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@harmony.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@harmony.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.harmony.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org
Received: (qmail 53811 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2009 09:18:16 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:18:16 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0
	tests=SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of t.p.ellison@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.219.206 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.219.206] (HELO mail-ew0-f206.google.com)
 (209.85.219.206)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 09:18:06 +0000
Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so5570192ewy.36
        for <dev@harmony.apache.org>; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=l9qIcPiJUBIpjVxWP3ocdmI2Anec9itafHQHu2LxVSM=;
        b=NMRJvKFYyd66lpBHzzcZNQJ+krvAiWQcrN1NFUyHgak6FTng668HJBDuUnJi87OTZ0
         7u9lPkFnrAXAqj9Clq7FDU477QAFldRRhCOKB+uRl+7uC6z7Tx+ftaBY0Hco5wDuI7q9
         va2QtlE8pxYBFpDP0AcGLncmdSeFPvZtkAxI0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ovwB+BQDJFg3HStqVRFY7sCjO4qMbsQ9AjwX3r6TwDnOVdQoRlofph8OSnX5j9yKPb
         gxe9cR+Fe/IgIcXmXenkcwtA5wxO6tuffry1pHXXh7dckf0L9E+pNeSVsHOuOe3IecyJ
         hV43mSBsymqhuIBbJKhkrvYRpYe1RJuwpqDak=
Received: by 10.210.127.10 with SMTP id z10mr5195067ebc.53.1247044665663;
        Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:17:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?9.20.183.159? (blueice2n1.uk.ibm.com [195.212.29.75])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm1119172eyd.8.2009.07.08.02.17.44
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:17:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4A546434.7020309@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:17:40 +0100
From: Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib][luni] HashMap doesn't support proxy object as keys
References: <c8963150906172352r6b016e03l4a8a98f789f07844@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4A39EAE6.2080502@gmail.com>
	 <c8963150906180107q5a833e50u3fa223b2ef8044ee@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4A3A20BA.7040003@gmail.com>
	 <c8963150906182255o29ffcc9dx1dce698fbf73b4cc@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4A542FE0.4020902@gmail.com>
 <40d9ca3e0907080021o181c6d4ejfe4c853203ab94f5@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <40d9ca3e0907080021o181c6d4ejfe4c853203ab94f5@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 08/Jul/2009 08:21, oleg babul wrote:
> To find entry in the HashMap RI performs:
<snip>

Oleg, please don't post any code to the mailing list unless you authored
it yourself and you are happy to grant an Apache license (ALv2) for us
to use it.

In particular, please don't post code or implementation details for code
that is under other licenses without checking if it is ok first.

Thanks,
Tim