Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of oliver.deakin@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.220.158 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=V7K4OpgAK1KMJQBiZX+cdw0yyJ9HX4ZurAviktbGkhVwJGgFcRm5uN0nN5+390OySp
         KtKNgMQKkqd3xy2aUfwd2VCqicwveAUvWvnEt0OGxE/xATJ/bI2Wv0iNSyWOL0olLnQm
         M4RzhVMPb5ObHWaDb44bePJfKb2gexDync6ao=
Message-ID: <4A240761.9050803@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:52:49 +0100
From: Oliver Deakin <oliver.deakin@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: Re: [M10] Testing
References: <4A1D5B2E.7060600@googlemail.com>
	 <200905280900.n4S90cAv006979@d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
	 <200905281333.n4SDXfB8027734@d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
	 <f944d83d0905290243v172f9c29p461ff127781785fe@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4A1FBFFE.6030501@googlemail.com>
	 <200905291551.n4TFpCEh004182@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
 <fc2fc95c0906010842i4829d1cby6d2c18fec35fed47@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <fc2fc95c0906010842i4829d1cby6d2c18fec35fed47@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Let's consider repo revision r780017 as M10 - I've just run all the 
classlib tests on Windows XP x86 and they have all passed successfully 
for me, so no adverse effects from the recent changes.

Does anyone have any more test results for any other platforms? It would 
be nice to have at least Linux x86 (and perhaps linux x86_64) if possible...

Im going to try and do some app testing as best I can this week - if 
anyone gets any time to do this, please post your results here.

Regards,
Oliver

Sian January wrote:
> Tests are still looking good for me on Windows after Mark's commit.
>
>
> 2009/5/29 Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>:
>   
>> Applied at r780017.  (Sorry I was a bit slow; I was too busy relaxing in
>> the sun.)
>>
>> -Mark.
>>
>> In message <4A1FBFFE.6030501@googlemail.com>, Oliver Deakin writes:
>>     
>>> Looks like the patch has 2 committers supporting - I'm also +1 to fixing
>>> the test crashes and if the patch for HARMONY-6132 does this without
>>> affecting any of the other tests, then Im also +1 to the patch. Please
>>> go ahead and commit it as soon as possible so we can begin final testing.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Oliver
>>>
>>> Alexey Varlamov wrote:
>>>       
>>>> 2009/5/28, Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>:
>>>> [skipped]
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> I also had two test crashes:
>>>>>
>>>>>  org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.SocketTest
>>>>>  org.apache.harmony.xnet.provider.jsse.SSLSocketImplTest
>>>>>
>>>>> which were both fixed by Ilya's patch in HARMONY-6132.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it would be good to apply the patch from HARMONY-6132 before M10.
>>>>> Does anyone else support/oppose this?
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> The fix looks reasonable and the issue is important enough to fix it in M10
>>>>         
>>> .
>>>       
>>>> --
>>>> Alexey
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>  Mark.
>>>>>           
>>> --
>>> Oliver Deakin
>>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 7415
>>> 98.
>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>>>
>>>       
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   

-- 
Oliver Deakin
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU