From dev-return-37350-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Tue Jun 02 15:08:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44725 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2009 15:08:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Jun 2009 15:08:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 61571 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2009 15:09:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 61531 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jun 2009 15:09:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 61520 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jun 2009 15:09:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:09:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of oliver.deakin@googlemail.com designates 72.14.220.157 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.14.220.157] (HELO fg-out-1718.google.com) (72.14.220.157) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 15:08:49 +0000 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so730490fgg.13 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 08:08:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lejOL+XHjZVlNtIDH+5lWaOLTINw+4z8yzoHFIpAey8=; b=dOD6lYaarZi+gcvG8qYn+Sea8sAdJdcjfjwE6taGbe8X+8dEqF50AzJCTV4mATu6bB 3hdNy8i3ZYmBrXdboR8lwJ10lSTjKDZ8Jj/IWyxlMczq2BK0Pw/lfzppKY0zCqXvl6Dn ivOlCenFgu2cF781R5fIugL6XjgIg0XwympNg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CN7P0g28EdxbQPGpXlOVN+IsGVcUMGPEJc0AyLzysipJ9uylRPGhpqTIlwXu+MrRMf zrMCC6yiGo8iyfjBGVUdf/0FM1MVucoCL7tQDdU1gmWOMayZ89sC3q0Gjl+9dDCiMjXd CCXVkWg80CH2QAvr68IoyLDC9dyytxjQn9854= Received: by 10.86.91.10 with SMTP id o10mr8039973fgb.13.1243955306934; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 08:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?9.20.183.159? (blueice2n1.uk.ibm.com [195.212.29.75]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e11sm11707468fga.16.2009.06.02.08.08.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 02 Jun 2009 08:08:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A254068.90300@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2009 16:08:24 +0100 From: Oliver Deakin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@harmony.apache.org Subject: Re: [M10] Testing References: <4A1D5B2E.7060600@googlemail.com> <200905280900.n4S90cAv006979@d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <200905281333.n4SDXfB8027734@d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <4A1FBFFE.6030501@googlemail.com> <200905291551.n4TFpCEh004182@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <4A240761.9050803@googlemail.com> <4A253B6D.9030408@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A253B6D.9030408@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Yep, you're totally correct - I'd missed those last issues. As you say, I think HARMONY-6193 and HARMONY-6155 are must fix, but are not functional so do not block testing. Does anyone think that any of the other issues in [1] are must-fix for M10? My personal feeling is that they are not and can be moved to an M11 target, but please speak up if you feel differently. Regards, Oliver [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310050&fixfor=12313869 Tim Ellison wrote: > I still see a bunch of JIRA issues flagged as to be fixed in M10. I'm > guessing these are mis-labeled except HARMONY-6193 and HARMONY-6155. > > Regards, > Tim > > Oliver Deakin wrote: > >> Let's consider repo revision r780017 as M10 - I've just run all the >> classlib tests on Windows XP x86 and they have all passed successfully >> for me, so no adverse effects from the recent changes. >> >> Does anyone have any more test results for any other platforms? It would >> be nice to have at least Linux x86 (and perhaps linux x86_64) if >> possible... >> >> Im going to try and do some app testing as best I can this week - if >> anyone gets any time to do this, please post your results here. >> >> Regards, >> Oliver >> >> Sian January wrote: >> >>> Tests are still looking good for me on Windows after Mark's commit. >>> >>> >>> 2009/5/29 Mark Hindess : >>> >>> >>>> Applied at r780017. (Sorry I was a bit slow; I was too busy relaxing in >>>> the sun.) >>>> >>>> -Mark. >>>> >>>> In message <4A1FBFFE.6030501@googlemail.com>, Oliver Deakin writes: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Looks like the patch has 2 committers supporting - I'm also +1 to >>>>> fixing >>>>> the test crashes and if the patch for HARMONY-6132 does this without >>>>> affecting any of the other tests, then Im also +1 to the patch. Please >>>>> go ahead and commit it as soon as possible so we can begin final >>>>> testing. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Oliver >>>>> >>>>> Alexey Varlamov wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> 2009/5/28, Mark Hindess : >>>>>> [skipped] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I also had two test crashes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.SocketTest >>>>>>> org.apache.harmony.xnet.provider.jsse.SSLSocketImplTest >>>>>>> >>>>>>> which were both fixed by Ilya's patch in HARMONY-6132. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think it would be good to apply the patch from HARMONY-6132 >>>>>>> before M10. >>>>>>> Does anyone else support/oppose this? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> The fix looks reasonable and the issue is important enough to fix >>>>>> it in M10 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> . >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Alexey >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Mark. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Oliver Deakin >>>>> Unless stated otherwise above: >>>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with >>>>> number 7415 >>>>> 98. >>>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire >>>>> PO6 3AU >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> > > -- Oliver Deakin Unless stated otherwise above: IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU