From dev-return-37352-apmail-harmony-dev-archive=harmony.apache.org@harmony.apache.org Wed Jun 03 01:38:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98584 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2009 01:38:53 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Jun 2009 01:38:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 47208 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2009 01:39:04 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-harmony-dev-archive@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 47123 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jun 2009 01:39:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@harmony.apache.org Received: (qmail 47112 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jun 2009 01:39:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:39:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nbeyer@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.190] (HELO mail-pz0-f190.google.com) (209.85.222.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:38:54 +0000 Received: by pzk28 with SMTP id 28so3774843pzk.20 for ; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:38:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=TM0zhbdmyNXpncOlns1Xw7db6IDwAsd4X7OQyWURcTo=; b=bq3Y8Rk9a5LGAXsbuWERqHBROhg3d556SYgGpiTAkv/qBcclb5eBz3icDmPKLq8kjQ CLUIp1hDcDeKlK13S0LRzQt++ZEWmrBwF7AiSBFnp8MInGBp9ghaTFr1bj8QKfOp1kWc 8mGM0iPafsIin9iSLIaNzcSIgb0NXIaVHEsVc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=hsd1aMlHLHiQfuSrVa7d1QOTqZ4bijNNFtGFIQAMb1S2jLESbUhu9kNyNKWsszi0La 6eliv0/jx+ZcydLChD+Db78zEaqXdxkEDDgx0BrMrwx3r7ds2vo7cqhNaekSWPXfOM3E LnUjqAJlmbiiMh7DEZp3JEvWSClvTuAgZIy6I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: nbeyer@gmail.com Received: by 10.143.18.16 with SMTP id v16mr141541wfi.142.1243993113398; Tue, 02 Jun 2009 18:38:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A254068.90300@googlemail.com> References: <4A1D5B2E.7060600@googlemail.com> <200905280900.n4S90cAv006979@d12av04.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <200905281333.n4SDXfB8027734@d12av03.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <4A1FBFFE.6030501@googlemail.com> <200905291551.n4TFpCEh004182@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <4A240761.9050803@googlemail.com> <4A253B6D.9030408@gmail.com> <4A254068.90300@googlemail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:38:33 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 98313e1ddc968932 Message-ID: <3b3f27c60906021838u61c69ce3h76a16642f56c2543@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [M10] Testing From: Nathan Beyer To: dev@harmony.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I changed most of the issues from 5M10 to Unknown, as they were issues that existed with M9 and either didn't show up until code freeze or didn't get looked at. We just need to get in the practice of leaving issues unknown until they're fixed and then mark the fix version. I would like to see the NOTICE and README issues fixed or commented on. I think Tim was working on one of them. -Nathan On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Oliver Deakin wrote: > Yep, you're totally correct - I'd missed those last issues. As you say, I > think HARMONY-6193 and HARMONY-6155 are must fix, but are not functional = so > do not block testing. > > Does anyone think that any of the other issues in [1] are must-fix for M1= 0? > My personal feeling is that they are not and can be moved to an M11 targe= t, > but please speak up if you feel differently. > > Regards, > Oliver > > [1] > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=3Dtrue&mod= e=3Dhide&sorter/order=3DDESC&sorter/field=3Dpriority&resolution=3D-1&pid=3D= 12310050&fixfor=3D12313869 > > Tim Ellison wrote: >> >> I still see a bunch of JIRA issues flagged as to be fixed in M10. =C2=A0= I'm >> guessing these are mis-labeled except HARMONY-6193 and HARMONY-6155. >> >> Regards, >> Tim >> >> Oliver Deakin wrote: >> >>> >>> Let's consider repo revision r780017 as M10 - I've just run all the >>> classlib tests on Windows XP x86 and they have all passed successfully >>> for me, so no adverse effects from the recent changes. >>> >>> Does anyone have any more test results for any other platforms? It woul= d >>> be nice to have at least Linux x86 (and perhaps linux x86_64) if >>> possible... >>> >>> Im going to try and do some app testing as best I can this week - if >>> anyone gets any time to do this, please post your results here. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Oliver >>> >>> Sian January wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Tests are still looking good for me on Windows after Mark's commit. >>>> >>>> >>>> 2009/5/29 Mark Hindess : >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Applied at r780017. =C2=A0(Sorry I was a bit slow; I was too busy rel= axing >>>>> in >>>>> the sun.) >>>>> >>>>> -Mark. >>>>> >>>>> In message <4A1FBFFE.6030501@googlemail.com>, Oliver Deakin writes: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Looks like the patch has 2 committers supporting - I'm also +1 to >>>>>> fixing >>>>>> the test crashes and if the patch for HARMONY-6132 does this without >>>>>> affecting any of the other tests, then Im also +1 to the patch. Plea= se >>>>>> go ahead and commit it as soon as possible so we can begin final >>>>>> testing. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Oliver >>>>>> >>>>>> Alexey Varlamov wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2009/5/28, Mark Hindess : >>>>>>> [skipped] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I also had two test crashes: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> =C2=A0org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.SocketTest >>>>>>>> =C2=A0org.apache.harmony.xnet.provider.jsse.SSLSocketImplTest >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> which were both fixed by Ilya's patch in HARMONY-6132. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think it would be good to apply the patch from HARMONY-6132 >>>>>>>> before M10. >>>>>>>> Does anyone else support/oppose this? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The fix looks reasonable and the issue is important enough to fix >>>>>>> it in M10 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> . >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Alexey >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> =C2=A0Mark. >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Oliver Deakin >>>>>> Unless stated otherwise above: >>>>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with >>>>>> number 7415 >>>>>> 98. >>>>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire >>>>>> PO6 3AU >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> > > -- > Oliver Deakin > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshir= e > PO6 3AU > >