harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tim Ellison <t.p.elli...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [M10] Testing
Date Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:47:09 GMT
I still see a bunch of JIRA issues flagged as to be fixed in M10.  I'm
guessing these are mis-labeled except HARMONY-6193 and HARMONY-6155.

Regards,
Tim

Oliver Deakin wrote:
> Let's consider repo revision r780017 as M10 - I've just run all the
> classlib tests on Windows XP x86 and they have all passed successfully
> for me, so no adverse effects from the recent changes.
> 
> Does anyone have any more test results for any other platforms? It would
> be nice to have at least Linux x86 (and perhaps linux x86_64) if
> possible...
> 
> Im going to try and do some app testing as best I can this week - if
> anyone gets any time to do this, please post your results here.
> 
> Regards,
> Oliver
> 
> Sian January wrote:
>> Tests are still looking good for me on Windows after Mark's commit.
>>
>>
>> 2009/5/29 Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>:
>>  
>>> Applied at r780017.  (Sorry I was a bit slow; I was too busy relaxing in
>>> the sun.)
>>>
>>> -Mark.
>>>
>>> In message <4A1FBFFE.6030501@googlemail.com>, Oliver Deakin writes:
>>>    
>>>> Looks like the patch has 2 committers supporting - I'm also +1 to
>>>> fixing
>>>> the test crashes and if the patch for HARMONY-6132 does this without
>>>> affecting any of the other tests, then Im also +1 to the patch. Please
>>>> go ahead and commit it as soon as possible so we can begin final
>>>> testing.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Oliver
>>>>
>>>> Alexey Varlamov wrote:
>>>>      
>>>>> 2009/5/28, Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com>:
>>>>> [skipped]
>>>>>
>>>>>        
>>>>>> I also had two test crashes:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  org.apache.harmony.luni.tests.java.net.SocketTest
>>>>>>  org.apache.harmony.xnet.provider.jsse.SSLSocketImplTest
>>>>>>
>>>>>> which were both fixed by Ilya's patch in HARMONY-6132.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it would be good to apply the patch from HARMONY-6132
>>>>>> before M10.
>>>>>> Does anyone else support/oppose this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>           
>>>>> The fix looks reasonable and the issue is important enough to fix
>>>>> it in M10
>>>>>         
>>>> .
>>>>      
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Alexey
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>        
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>  Mark.
>>>>>>           
>>>> -- 
>>>> Oliver Deakin
>>>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with
>>>> number 7415
>>>> 98.
>>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
>>>> PO6 3AU
>>>>
>>>>       
>>>
>>>     
>>
>>
>>
>>   
> 

Mime
View raw message