harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tony Wu <wuyue...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [result] Accept JDWP contribution in HARMONY-6187
Date Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:41:23 GMT
Thanks Oliver, pls go ahead!

On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Oliver
Deakin<oliver.deakin@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Just a heads up, Im going to start working on committing the accepted JDWP
> contribution into the Java 6 branch.
>
> Regards,
> Oliver
>
> Oliver Deakin wrote:
>>
>> +1 votes from Sean, Jimmy, Gregory, Jim, Alexey, Nathan, Regis, Kevin,
>> Pavel, Sian, Alexei, Mark, Tim, Tony and Ilya.
>>
>> No other votes, so the vote passes.
>>
>> Thanks all for voting - I will wait until after M10 to check in the code
>> since we are about to enter feature freeze.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Oliver
>>
>>
>> Oliver Deakin wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> It's been a week since I sent out the initial mail about this
>>> contribution and opinion seems positive so I'd like to open a vote to
>>> officially accept the contribution.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Accept this contribution
>>> [ ] -1 Reject this contribution because...
>>>
>>> I'll conclude the vote in 3 days as usual, unless anyone needs more time.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Oliver
>>>
>>>
>>> Oliver Deakin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> A little while ago, IBM created a mirror of the Java 6 jdktools branch
>>>> so that we could start bringing Harmony JDWP into the IBM Java releases.
We
>>>> began working in that mirror because it was convenient for our internal
>>>> builds, with a plan to reflect all changes we made back into Harmony as we
>>>> went. Unfortunately, as deadlines drew in and releases came and went those
>>>> plans did not come into fruition - until now :)
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to announce the contribution of an enhanced Java 6 level JDWP
>>>> agent and socket transport layer. It has been attached to HARMONY-6187 [1]
>>>> for everyone to try out - please take a look. It has the following
>>>> enhancements:
>>>> - A large number of bug fixes.
>>>> - Ported to a wide variety of platforms - Linux x86/x86_64, Linux PPC
>>>> 32/64, zLinux 31/64, Windows x86/x86_64, AIX PPC 32/64 and zOS 31/64.
>>>> - As part of the porting process, all non-portable C++ usage has been
>>>> removed and rewritten, particularly use of C++ standard libraries.
>>>> - JSR 45 support implemented. The new JDWP agent allows debugging of
>>>> non-Java stratum code running on the VM, for example JSPs.
>>>> - Significant performance improvements.
>>>>
>>>> All authors already have ACQs recorded. There may be some more work to
>>>> be done to get the new JDWP functioning 100% with Harmony, but I'd rather
do
>>>> that work out in the open once it is committed. Please let me know if there
>>>> are any objections/comments to this contribution! I'll give it a few days
>>>> and then start a vote.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Oliver
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6187
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Oliver Deakin
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire
> PO6 3AU
>
>



-- 
Tony Wu
China Software Development Lab, IBM

Mime
View raw message