harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Hindess <mark.hind...@googlemail.com>
Subject Re: [M10] Fixing README/NOTICE/LICENSE files
Date Thu, 04 Jun 2009 10:09:36 GMT

In message <25aac9fc0906040253o2eb1b5f2p42faa517a3a672bd@mail.gmail.com>,
sebb writes:
>
> On 04/06/2009, Mark Hindess <mark.hindess@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > In message <200906031731.n53HVE1v011013@d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>,
> > Mark Hindess writes:
> >
> >  > In message <20090603171929.32202724888@athena.apache.org>, Mark Hindess
> >  > writes:
> >  > >
> >  > > Committed in r781482.  There were no code changes so this
> >  > > update doesn't impact any existing testing.
> >  >
> >  > Just to clarify, we still need to fix the content of (at least)
> >  > the top-level federation build NOTICE file for M10.
> >
> > Based on the discussion on this list, my reading of the thread at:
> >
> >   http://markmail.org/thread/shzezyoalnydbflq
> >
> >  and some reading of other NOTICE files, I think we just need
> >  something like the attached patch for M10.
> >
> >  Can I have committer approval and/or comments please?  My intention
> >  would be to apply the patch twice (to the top-level and classlib
> >  NOTICE files).
>
> Most of the patch appears to be the license - PERMISSION - for ICU4J,
> and should therefore be in the LICENSE file.

It is also in the LICENSE file.  If you think the it should not be
reproduced in full in NOTICE then what would be the minimal sufficient
content with respect to ICU4J for the NOTICE file?

Regards,
-Mark



Mime
View raw message