Mailing-List: contact dev-help@harmony.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of t.p.ellison@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.219.161 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        b=XLXBMdiBr4rIEEOK9zO8ZTwPRHKVnGlYcA6vqyWf4DxpFSxHm5wrwuQbHMDgJDw61J
         rPfklIpkNu8faMmrQdGcKcTNPjAMSKpHEomRQXFpdiDStiJUfE2aOZmKrYMkK+dA472U
         j/HmqqU8Lolp/Laz5u1zINRmaFl+roeEmUQh8=
Message-ID: <49FB4E45.3080106@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 20:32:21 +0100
From: Tim Ellison <t.p.ellison@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@harmony.apache.org
Subject: [general] NOTICE file does not have required contents (HARMONY-6155)
References: <1298127067.1241199630649.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
In-Reply-To: <1298127067.1241199630649.JavaMail.jira@brutus>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sebb commented on HARMONY-6155:
> 
> I think there are still some tweaks to be made.
> 
> There seem to be some items missing from the NOTICE file - I
> would expect this to mention most, if not all, of the 3rd party items.
> For example:
> 
> ICU4C 
> Copyright (c) 1995-2005 International Business Machines Corporation and others
> All rights reserved.

What are the criteria you are applying to determine which third-party
items are put in the NOTICE file rather than the LICENSE file?

If you take a look at the (canonical) example of httpd's NOTICE [1] and
LICENSE [2] you can see similar distinctions.

[1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/NOTICE?view=co
[2] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/LICENSE?view=co

> [BTW, do you still use both versions of ICU4C?]

No.  Why do you ask?  Are you confusing the ICU4C and ICU4J entries?

> ZLIB version 1.2.3
>  (C) 1995-2004 Jean-loup Gailly and Mark Adler
> 
> etc. 
> 
> But not Apache Yoko, and probably not necessary for the IETF RFCs

Regards,
Tim