harmony-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pavel Pervov <pmcfi...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [vote] Accept JDWP contribution in HARMONY-6187
Date Tue, 12 May 2009 07:49:45 GMT
+1 from me.

2009/5/12, Kevin Zhou <zhoukevin83@gmail.com>:
> +1
> That's great.
>
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Regis <xu.regis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Oliver Deakin wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> It's been a week since I sent out the initial mail about this
>>> contribution
>>> and opinion seems positive so I'd like to open a vote to officially
>>> accept
>>> the contribution.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Accept this contribution
>>> [ ] -1 Reject this contribution because...
>>>
>>> I'll conclude the vote in 3 days as usual, unless anyone needs more time.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Oliver
>>>
>>>
>>> Oliver Deakin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> A little while ago, IBM created a mirror of the Java 6 jdktools branch
>>>> so
>>>> that we could start bringing Harmony JDWP into the IBM Java releases. We
>>>> began working in that mirror because it was convenient for our internal
>>>> builds, with a plan to reflect all changes we made back into Harmony as
>>>> we
>>>> went. Unfortunately, as deadlines drew in and releases came and went
>>>> those
>>>> plans did not come into fruition - until now :)
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to announce the contribution of an enhanced Java 6 level JDWP
>>>> agent and socket transport layer. It has been attached to HARMONY-6187
>>>> [1]
>>>> for everyone to try out - please take a look. It has the following
>>>> enhancements:
>>>> - A large number of bug fixes.
>>>> - Ported to a wide variety of platforms - Linux x86/x86_64, Linux PPC
>>>> 32/64, zLinux 31/64, Windows x86/x86_64, AIX PPC 32/64 and zOS 31/64.
>>>> - As part of the porting process, all non-portable C++ usage has been
>>>> removed and rewritten, particularly use of C++ standard libraries.
>>>> - JSR 45 support implemented. The new JDWP agent allows debugging of
>>>> non-Java stratum code running on the VM, for example JSPs.
>>>> - Significant performance improvements.
>>>>
>>>> All authors already have ACQs recorded. There may be some more work to
>>>> be
>>>> done to get the new JDWP functioning 100% with Harmony, but I'd rather
>>>> do
>>>> that work out in the open once it is committed. Please let me know if
>>>> there
>>>> are any objections/comments to this contribution! I'll give it a few
>>>> days
>>>> and then start a vote.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Oliver
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6187
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> +1
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Regis.
>>
>

Mime
View raw message